HPS masthead
What's New?
. Fukushima Decontamination Report
. CRCPD & CDC Grants for Volunteer Corps
. America's Nuclear Future
. February Newsletter
. Boice Nominated President of NCRP
. February Journal
. February ORS
. Schauer Given the Butterfly Award from Image Gently
. Kase President's Report to IRPA
. IRPA13 Accepting Posters
Upcoming Events
. HPS Midyear - Issues in Waste Management
5-8 February 2012
Dallas, Texas
. NRC Regulatory Information Conference
NRC Regulatory Information Conference
13-15 March 2012
Rockville, Maryland
. NCRP Annual Meeting
12-13 March 2012
Washington, DC
. James E. Turner Memorial Symposium
Call for Abstracts
18-19 April 2012
Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Pollard Auditorium, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
. IRPA13
13-18 May 2012
Glasgow, Scotland
. Canadian Radiation Protection Association (CRPA) Annual Meeting
27-30 May 2012
Halifax, Nova Scotia
. ACS Undergrad Summer Schools
10 June- 20 July 2012
. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Meeting Webcasts
February 2012
Bethesda, Maryland
09 February 2012

Evaluation of Health Physics Instruments Model 2080 Pulse Neutron Survey Meter, Model 6030 Ion Chamber, and Model 1030 Pulse Survey Meter in a Linear Accelerator Produced Neutron Field

E. Anderson1; K. Claver1; B. Schrader2; and R.R. Brey1 (1Idaho State University - Dept. of Physics/Health Physics Program; 2Idaho National Laboratory)

The measurement of neutron fields is of increasing importance considering devices that generate pulsed neutron radiation as employed in homeland security. An example; pulsed linear accelerators that generate large Bremsstrahlung fields, and the subsequent photonuclear-reaction-generated pulsed neutron fields. Questions exist as to the efficacy of available detectors and neutron dose-equivalent type survey meters to quantify these fields complicated by changing energy spectra. Are these neutron detection devices truly independent of charge collection time and the magnitude of charge magnitude? A project to evaluate this question is underway. Phase I includes consideration of detector response in a well characterized source field. Phase II considers a linear accelerator produced neutron-field generated using the (γ,238U) reaction to produce neutrons. During this phase the accelerator radiation pulse width and pulse height remain constant while pulse repetition rate is varied. Phase III involves keeping the repetition rate constant and varying the width of the accelerator radiation peak while maintaining the area under the peak. An additional investigation involves maintaining the repetition rate and pulse width constant while varying the pulse amplitude. The independent variable of survey meter dose-equivalent response versus that of known field conditions from these experimental investigations is presented.

Return to Session list.

image
image
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings