HPS masthead
What's New?
. Fukushima Decontamination Report
. CRCPD & CDC Grants for Volunteer Corps
. America's Nuclear Future
. February Newsletter
. Boice Nominated President of NCRP
. February Journal
. February ORS
. Schauer Given the Butterfly Award from Image Gently
. Kase President's Report to IRPA
. IRPA13 Accepting Posters
Upcoming Events
. HPS Midyear - Issues in Waste Management
5-8 February 2012
Dallas, Texas
. NRC Regulatory Information Conference
NRC Regulatory Information Conference
13-15 March 2012
Rockville, Maryland
. NCRP Annual Meeting
12-13 March 2012
Washington, DC
. James E. Turner Memorial Symposium
Call for Abstracts
18-19 April 2012
Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Pollard Auditorium, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
. IRPA13
13-18 May 2012
Glasgow, Scotland
. Canadian Radiation Protection Association (CRPA) Annual Meeting
27-30 May 2012
Halifax, Nova Scotia
. ACS Undergrad Summer Schools
10 June- 20 July 2012
. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Meeting Webcasts
February 2012
Bethesda, Maryland
09 February 2012

Phenomenon Involving the Change in Neutron Survey Meter Efficiency Versus Accumulated Dose

R.K. Piper1; M.K. Murphy1; and A.K. Thompson2 (1Battelle-PNNL; 2NIST)

Some individuals in the nuclear industry, including operators of the calibration laboratories at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), have observed a phenomenon in some neutron survey instruments that involves a change in detector efficiency as the integrated dose increases. This effect appears to be limited to proportional counter-based neutron detectors (e.g., BF3 and 3He detectors), and can get as high as 15-20% before stabilizing. The amplitude of the effect appears to have no correlation with detector model and, in fact, can vary widely for units of the same model. The elevated response eventually returns to the “baseline” response condition, but the time to return also appears to be inconsistent for a given detector (hours to days). This effect can easily go unnoticed by the calibrator, and has the potential for significant calibration errors for the detector being calibrated (i.e., when used as a survey instrument), as well as on the reference fields being calibrated using the detector (i.e., when used as a transfer standard). Data obtained at both PNNL and NIST, the potential influence upon neutron calibrations, and recommended methods for compensating for this effect are presented.

Return to Session list.

image
image
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings