HPS masthead
What's New?
. Fukushima Decontamination Report
. CRCPD & CDC Grants for Volunteer Corps
. America's Nuclear Future
. February Newsletter
. Boice Nominated President of NCRP
. February Journal
. February ORS
. Schauer Given the Butterfly Award from Image Gently
. Kase President's Report to IRPA
. IRPA13 Accepting Posters
Upcoming Events
. HPS Midyear - Issues in Waste Management
5-8 February 2012
Dallas, Texas
. NRC Regulatory Information Conference
NRC Regulatory Information Conference
13-15 March 2012
Rockville, Maryland
. NCRP Annual Meeting
12-13 March 2012
Washington, DC
. James E. Turner Memorial Symposium
Call for Abstracts
18-19 April 2012
Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Pollard Auditorium, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
. IRPA13
13-18 May 2012
Glasgow, Scotland
. Canadian Radiation Protection Association (CRPA) Annual Meeting
27-30 May 2012
Halifax, Nova Scotia
. ACS Undergrad Summer Schools
10 June- 20 July 2012
. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Meeting Webcasts
February 2012
Bethesda, Maryland
09 February 2012

Issues in the Design of MARSSIM Surveys for Materials and Equipment

Authors

C. V. Gogolak, R. A. Meck, G. Powers, A. Williams, D. Alberth, R. Bhat, C. Bias, S. Doremus, K. Snead, C. Petullo

Abstract

MARSSIM (NUREG-1575) addresses the conduct of final status surveys for residual radioactivity in surface soil and building surfaces. The draft technical report NUREG-1761, "Radiological Surveys for Controlling Release of Solid Materials," was the first attempt to extend this guidance to include materials and equipment. From this starting point, the MARSSIM workgroup is developing a MARSSIM supplement called MARSAME, "Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Assessment of Materials and Equipment." The purpose of MARSAME is to provide multi-agency guidance, based on the Data Quality Objectives (DQOs) process, for the design and implementation of surveys to determine whether there is a need to initiate or continue radiological controls on specific materials and equipment. Survey results must be able to demonstrate that appropriate disposition criteria have been met within predetermined confidence limits. A graded approach to classifying materials and equipment as candidates for disposition surveys can be simple or complex, because of the very large variety of forms and kinds of materials and equipment that could potentially be involved. The intrinsic value of the materials and equipment and the costs of disposal have roles in these processes. Additional complexity is introduced when surfaces are difficult to access for measurement and radionuclides are distributed throughout a volume of materials or equipment. The appropriate size of survey units for materials and equipment may be more difficult to establish. Equipment may be as small as a single hammer or as large as a piece of earth-moving equipment. Various alternatives for survey design that address these issues are possible depending on the specific material and radionuclides involved. In particular, new perspectives on scanning and in toto measurements are important in addressing material disposition options.

Meeting

This abstract was presented at the 38th Annual Midyear Meeting, "Materials Control and Security: Risk Assessment, Handling, and Detection", Advances in Instrumentation, Materials Detection and Measurement Session, 2/13/2005 - 2/16/2005, held in New Orleans, LA.

 
Index of Midyear Meeting Abstracts

image
image
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings