HPS masthead
What's New?
. Fukushima Decontamination Report
. CRCPD & CDC Grants for Volunteer Corps
. America's Nuclear Future
. February Newsletter
. Boice Nominated President of NCRP
. February Journal
. February ORS
. Schauer Given the Butterfly Award from Image Gently
. Kase President's Report to IRPA
. IRPA13 Accepting Posters
Upcoming Events
. HPS Midyear - Issues in Waste Management
5-8 February 2012
Dallas, Texas
. NRC Regulatory Information Conference
NRC Regulatory Information Conference
13-15 March 2012
Rockville, Maryland
. NCRP Annual Meeting
12-13 March 2012
Washington, DC
. James E. Turner Memorial Symposium
Call for Abstracts
18-19 April 2012
Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Pollard Auditorium, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
. IRPA13
13-18 May 2012
Glasgow, Scotland
. Canadian Radiation Protection Association (CRPA) Annual Meeting
27-30 May 2012
Halifax, Nova Scotia
. ACS Undergrad Summer Schools
10 June- 20 July 2012
. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Meeting Webcasts
February 2012
Bethesda, Maryland
09 February 2012

Structure of a Radiological Emergency Response Program

Author

P. Chowdhury

Abstract

The primary broad components of a radiological emergency response program may be divided into the following: (1) jurisdictional entities, (2) support resources, (3) executable response functions, and (4) modes of execution. Component 1 identifies various organizations to be involved in the program; component 2 identifies all the material objects that are necessary for nondisruptive execution of the program; to component 3 belong the clearly established broad "response functions" that will be executed in order to meet the program objectives; and, finally, under component 4 are gathered various modes that will trigger the "onset" of execution for the processes under the "response functions" to be carried out by different organizational entities that are part of the response program. Thus, when a predefined "mode of execution" triggers the onset of one or more actions, the involved "jurisdictional entities" execute the necessary "response functions" in the proper sequence with the help of one or more "support resources," making it more processdependent. The basic format of such structuring is simple; identifying all necessary functions requires the understanding of the "intra-agency" and "inter-agency" interaction protocol, scope and limitations of the assigned tasks, and organizational "modus operandi." Also, one individual or a group of individuals will, in most cases, perform multiple functions, and as such, it is extremely important that the attributes and relational bonds be carefully designed and clearly understood. The efficiency of the evolved structured program will, for the most part, depend on the articulation and mastery during the design phase of this part. A group of well-trained individuals must be maintained at all times through detailed and continuous training, which must be an integral part of this program. Once all the criteria are met and the structure is in place, the program automatically assumes a "process-dependent" nature and becomes "dynamic" in behavior through its characteristic "functional relationship."

Meeting

This abstract was presented at the 38th Annual Midyear Meeting, "Materials Control and Security: Risk Assessment, Handling, and Detection", Emergency Response Planning and Programs – Part II Session, 2/13/2005 - 2/16/2005, held in New Orleans, LA.

 
Index of Midyear Meeting Abstracts

image
image
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings