HPS masthead
What's New?
. Fukushima Decontamination Report
. CRCPD & CDC Grants for Volunteer Corps
. America's Nuclear Future
. February Newsletter
. Boice Nominated President of NCRP
. February Journal
. February ORS
. Schauer Given the Butterfly Award from Image Gently
. Kase President's Report to IRPA
. IRPA13 Accepting Posters
Upcoming Events
. HPS Midyear - Issues in Waste Management
5-8 February 2012
Dallas, Texas
. NRC Regulatory Information Conference
NRC Regulatory Information Conference
13-15 March 2012
Rockville, Maryland
. NCRP Annual Meeting
12-13 March 2012
Washington, DC
. James E. Turner Memorial Symposium
Call for Abstracts
18-19 April 2012
Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Pollard Auditorium, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
. IRPA13
13-18 May 2012
Glasgow, Scotland
. Canadian Radiation Protection Association (CRPA) Annual Meeting
27-30 May 2012
Halifax, Nova Scotia
. ACS Undergrad Summer Schools
10 June- 20 July 2012
. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Meeting Webcasts
February 2012
Bethesda, Maryland
08 February 2012

Answer to Question #110 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Policy, Guidelines, and Regulations — Guidance Documents

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q
What is the origin of release criteria for personnel who have potential contamination on their skin?
A
Release criteria for personnel contamination of the skin, or clothing, is intended to meet the following goals or requirements for occupational workers (i.e., this is not applicable for release criteria, for example, for patients who have received diagnostic or therapeutic administration of radio-pharmaceuticals):
  1. It must be low enough to ensure exposure limits are not approached for the contaminated individual, or any individual coming in close proximity or contact with the contaminated person.
     
  2. It must be low enough to ensure subsequent ingestion or inhalation of the radioactive material coming off the contaminated individual cannot result in an intake of any radiological significance.
     
  3. It must be high enough to allow for detection using readily available and standard radiation survey instrumentation.
     
  4. It should be at a level that serves as an indicator that good contamination control practices in the workplace may have failed in order for the contamination to have occurred.
The most limiting condition of these goals or requirements is, invariably, number 3; that is, the capability of survey instrumentation to detect contamination drives the release criteria. The levels at which standard survey instruments (for example, a Geiger-Muller tube "frisker" and meter, or portal monitoring systems) are well below the levels that would give any concern for subsequent exposure. However, the detection of unexpected personnel contamination should be taken seriously by radiation protection personnel because it may be an indicator that some aspect of contamination control procedures failed with a potential for greater consequences later if the cause is not found and corrected. In addition, any contamination detected above the release criteria should be removed, using reasonable efforts and techniques, even if it doesn't pose an exposure hazard. This is part of the philosophy to keep exposures As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA). However, care should be taken not to use cleaning techniques on the skin that may injure the skin for contamination levels that are above the release criteria but low enough to not cause a concern for the exposure.

Keith H. Dinger, CHP
The information and material posted on this website is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Website. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
image
image
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings