HPS masthead
What's New?
. Fukushima Decontamination Report
. CRCPD & CDC Grants for Volunteer Corps
. America's Nuclear Future
. February Newsletter
. Boice Nominated President of NCRP
. February Journal
. February ORS
. Schauer Given the Butterfly Award from Image Gently
. Kase President's Report to IRPA
. IRPA13 Accepting Posters
Upcoming Events
. HPS Midyear - Issues in Waste Management
5-8 February 2012
Dallas, Texas
. NRC Regulatory Information Conference
NRC Regulatory Information Conference
13-15 March 2012
Rockville, Maryland
. NCRP Annual Meeting
12-13 March 2012
Washington, DC
. James E. Turner Memorial Symposium
Call for Abstracts
18-19 April 2012
Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Pollard Auditorium, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
. IRPA13
13-18 May 2012
Glasgow, Scotland
. Canadian Radiation Protection Association (CRPA) Annual Meeting
27-30 May 2012
Halifax, Nova Scotia
. ACS Undergrad Summer Schools
10 June- 20 July 2012
. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Meeting Webcasts
February 2012
Bethesda, Maryland
09 February 2012

Answer to Question #1143 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Environmental and Background Radiation — Water

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q
We live near a quarry and gravel pit which frequently blasts for its material. A recent series of water tests has revealed high levels of uranium in our housing development's wells. Does blasting affect water quality; that is, would the blasting "shake things up" below the surface and affect water quality?
A
After consultation with our local uranium-in-groundwater expert, I would have to say that blasting would probably not affect uranium levels in water in these circumstances. If there is uranium in groundwater and well water now, there was likely uranium in ground and well water before the quarrying activities. This appears to be the case whether the quarrying was for gravel or for hard rock. I cite the Manitoba, Canada, experience with the Underground Research Laboratory (URL). Baseline studies carried out in the area of the URL indicated that uranium was present in well water throughout the region (even well outside the influence zone of the URL) before the facility was constructed. Construction and operation of the URL does not appear to have influenced these levels significantly. Note that I have specified circumstances typical of simple quarrying. I do not know all the circumstances of the operations in question. For example: Are there waste rock materials that must be stockpiled or disposed of at the surface? Is surface water leaching of stored materials an issue? Also, what I have said only applies to uranium in groundwater. There may be potential for contamination by hazardous materials that are improperly handled in the operation of the facilities, including blasting materials, drilling muds, fuels, oils, etc. John Barnard Director of Facilities
Answer posted on 20 September 2001. The information and material posted on this website is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Website. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
image
image
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings