HPS masthead
What's New?
. Fukushima Decontamination Report
. CRCPD & CDC Grants for Volunteer Corps
. America's Nuclear Future
. February Newsletter
. Boice Nominated President of NCRP
. February Journal
. February ORS
. Schauer Given the Butterfly Award from Image Gently
. Kase President's Report to IRPA
. IRPA13 Accepting Posters
Upcoming Events
. HPS Midyear - Issues in Waste Management
5-8 February 2012
Dallas, Texas
. NRC Regulatory Information Conference
NRC Regulatory Information Conference
13-15 March 2012
Rockville, Maryland
. NCRP Annual Meeting
12-13 March 2012
Washington, DC
. James E. Turner Memorial Symposium
Call for Abstracts
18-19 April 2012
Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Pollard Auditorium, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
. IRPA13
13-18 May 2012
Glasgow, Scotland
. Canadian Radiation Protection Association (CRPA) Annual Meeting
27-30 May 2012
Halifax, Nova Scotia
. ACS Undergrad Summer Schools
10 June- 20 July 2012
. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Meeting Webcasts
February 2012
Bethesda, Maryland
09 February 2012

Answer to Question #1202 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Nuclear Power — Nuclear Energy

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q
1. What are the relevant pathways of exposure which are to be considered while evaluating the radiation dose to the occupants of the control room under a design basis accident in a nuclear power plant? 2. Is there any permissible limit of the exposures under such situations? 3. Is there any ready-made computer code available for this?
A
Answer to Question 1: There are several: (1) exposure due to inhalation of contaminated air inside the control room due to infiltration/ventilation from the plume or from adjacent buildings, (2) external exposure due to shine from contaminated air inside control room due to infiltration/ventilation from the plume or from adjacent buildings, (3) radiation shine from release cloud outside of the control room envelope, (4) radiation shine from radioactive material in the reactor containment, and (5) radiation shine from radioactive materials in systems or components inside or outside the control room envelope, for example, recirculation filters. The significance of the different pathways depends greatly on the plant design and operation, for example, amount of infiltration, location of control room relative to other buildings. (See Regulatory Guide 1.183 section 4.2 and NUREG-0800 Section 6.4.)

Answer to Question 2: The term "permissible exposure" is inappropriate. There are criteria that apply to the design of the control room. The facility is designed to withstand certain design basis accidents. The radiation exposure of personnel during the accident are controlled under the occupational worker limits of 10 CFR 20. That said, 10 CFR 20 does not limit actions that may be necessary to protect health and safety. Licensees are required to include provisions for emergency worker exposures during emergencies. These are required to be based on the Environmental Protection Agency Emergency Worker and Livesaving Activity Protective Action Guides. It should be noted that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) credits any such exposures against the individual's occupational exposure history. 10 CFR 50 Appendix A General Design Criterion 19 provides: "Adequate radiation protection shall be provided to permit access and occupancy of the control room under accident conditions without personnel receiving radiation exposures in excess of 5 rem whole body, or its equivalent to any part of the body, for the duration of the accident." NUREG-0800 Section 6.4 interprets "equivalent" as 30 rem thyroid and 30 rem skin. For facilities that have implemented an alternative source term under 10 CFR 50.67, the dose criterion is 5 rem total effective dose equivalent.
Answer to Question 3:
The NRC-sponsored RADTRAD code (NUREG/CR-6604) and HABIT codes (NUREG/CR-6210) can be used to assess the dose from exposure to contaminated air inside the control room. Modules within the SCALE software suite (NUREG/CR-0200) can be used for the radiation shine doses. There are other proprietary codes used by licensees and vendors to make these assessments.

Alan Roecklein
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Answer posted on 19 September 2001. The information and material posted on this website is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Website. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
image
image
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings