HPS masthead
What's New?
. Fukushima Decontamination Report
. CRCPD & CDC Grants for Volunteer Corps
. America's Nuclear Future
. February Newsletter
. Boice Nominated President of NCRP
. February Journal
. February ORS
. Schauer Given the Butterfly Award from Image Gently
. Kase President's Report to IRPA
. IRPA13 Accepting Posters
Upcoming Events
. HPS Midyear - Issues in Waste Management
5-8 February 2012
Dallas, Texas
. NRC Regulatory Information Conference
NRC Regulatory Information Conference
13-15 March 2012
Rockville, Maryland
. NCRP Annual Meeting
12-13 March 2012
Washington, DC
. James E. Turner Memorial Symposium
Call for Abstracts
18-19 April 2012
Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Pollard Auditorium, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
. IRPA13
13-18 May 2012
Glasgow, Scotland
. Canadian Radiation Protection Association (CRPA) Annual Meeting
27-30 May 2012
Halifax, Nova Scotia
. ACS Undergrad Summer Schools
10 June- 20 July 2012
. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Meeting Webcasts
February 2012
Bethesda, Maryland
09 February 2012

Answer to Question #1215 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Historical Issues/Applications

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q
Does anyone know anything about the radioactive constituents of old camera lenses (rare earths containing radium perhaps) and/or possible neutron activation of nonradioactive lens materials? This relates to an interesting relic (supposedly of the Manhattan District or one of the later programs) that was used on a high-speed camera in one of the early tests. The optics are discolored in the manner of glass exposed to high gamma doses, and the assembly emits significant levels of gamma radiation which is not the result of any luminescing agent. It's a neat item for radiation demonstrations and I would like to provide a sensible account of the origin of the radiation. Any ideas?
A

The most likely explanation is that your device incorporates a thorium-containing (thoriated) lens. Many of the lenses used by the military, some of which date from WWII, were quite radioactive due to their thorium content (232Th)—up to 30 percent by weight. Although 232Th does not emit gamma rays, its short-lived decay products, which are also present, do.

The thorium was primarily used in higher-quality lenses. Because thorium increased the index of refraction, the lenses could be built with less curvature—this made them thinner and lighter. Production of thorium-containing lenses pretty much ceased by the late 1980s.

It is not uncommon for old thoriated lenses to be colored (reddish-brown?) in the manner you describe due to self-irradiation. For what it's worth, this color can be removed by heating.

A second, more remote, possibility is that a radium-containing radioluminescent marker is present. Although you ruled this possibility out, these markers can sometimes be very difficult to identify.

Neutron activation is not a viable explanation.

References

Paul Frame, CHP, PhD

Answer posted on 31 October 2001. The information and material posted on this website is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Website. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
image
image
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings