HPS masthead
search
What's New?
. April Newsletter
. April Journal
Upcoming Events
. 2010 Summer Professional Development School
Internal Dosimetry
23 - 26 June 2010
Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho
. International Conference on Radiation Protection in Medicine
1-3 September 2010
Varna, Bulgaria
. 2010 Meeting of the Air Monitoring Users Group
4-7 May 2010
Las Vegas, NV
19 March 2010

Answer to Question #1225 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Instrumentation and Measurements — Surveys and Measurements (SM)

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q
When using a Ludlum model 14C with a pancake probe checking for 99mTc contamination, does the plastic beta shield need to be taken off or can it be left on? Does 99Mo breakthrough contribute significantly in checking for 99mTc contamination in a hospital setting?
A
The decay scheme for 99mTc notes that over 10% of the decays have conversion electrons over 100 keV, with ~ 89% of the gamma photons at 140 keV. The plastic beta shield will attenuate these conversion electrons and, to a very minor extent, the low-energy gammas. I'd remove the beta shield cap from the probe and use the open mica window for contamination surveys. You could prove this by simulating some contamination. Try to keep a fixed geometry and the count rate about 10,000 counts per minute (for statistics and dead time concerns). Measure a spot with the shield and without. My gut feeling is you'll see a slight increase without the attenuation of the beta shield. There should not be much 99Mo breakthrough, but you should know that from daily dose calibrator measurements. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission sets a limit on breakthrough in 10CFR35.204: "Permissible molybdenum-99 concentration. (a) A licensee may not administer to humans a radiopharmaceutical containing more than 0.15 microcurie of molybdenum-99 per millicurie of technetium-99m." Only 0.00015 decays should be from 99Mo per decay of 99mTc. And although 99Mo is a beta emitter, even at maximum allowed concentration, it will not contribute much to your contamination survey results.

David J. Allard, CHP
Answer posted on 25 September 2001. The information and material posted on this Web site is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Web site. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings