HPS masthead
What's New?
. Fukushima Decontamination Report
. CRCPD & CDC Grants for Volunteer Corps
. America's Nuclear Future
. February Newsletter
. Boice Nominated President of NCRP
. February Journal
. February ORS
. Schauer Given the Butterfly Award from Image Gently
. Kase President's Report to IRPA
. IRPA13 Accepting Posters
Upcoming Events
. HPS Midyear - Issues in Waste Management
5-8 February 2012
Dallas, Texas
. NRC Regulatory Information Conference
NRC Regulatory Information Conference
13-15 March 2012
Rockville, Maryland
. NCRP Annual Meeting
12-13 March 2012
Washington, DC
. James E. Turner Memorial Symposium
Call for Abstracts
18-19 April 2012
Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Pollard Auditorium, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
. IRPA13
13-18 May 2012
Glasgow, Scotland
. Canadian Radiation Protection Association (CRPA) Annual Meeting
27-30 May 2012
Halifax, Nova Scotia
. ACS Undergrad Summer Schools
10 June- 20 July 2012
. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Meeting Webcasts
February 2012
Bethesda, Maryland
07 February 2012

Answer to Question #130 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Policy, Guidelines, and Regulations

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q
Must an NRC licensee report the loss of a 10CFR31.3 Po-210 static eliminator? Per 10CFR20.2201? Why or why not? This is a graded approach question because the device is low dose and already accessable to the general public with basically no controls.
A
My understanding (based on conversations with regulators and regulated alike) is that loss of generally licensed materials by licensees still must be reported. In fact, I had one regulator tell me that Region I's interpretation was that even exempt quantities had to be reported as lost if they belonged to a licensee. Apparently the philosophy is that a licensee is responsible for ALL radioactive material received, even if generally licensed. One rationale for this is that, if contamination above release limits is found in an uncontrolled area or if radioactive material is found in a dumpster nobody is going to try to find a pedigree for the material to see if it was licensed, generally licensed, or exempt. On the other hand, I have also been told that exempt material is exempt no matter who holds it.

In the case of the static eliminator that's generally licensed you should also check to see who owns it. We have several here, but they're all leased. We haven't lost any, however, so I don't know what the outcome of that would be.

The bottom line is that my understanding is that a licensee is responsible for all radioactive materials received. Hope this helps.

Andrew Karam, CHP
University of Rochester
The information and material posted on this website is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Website. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
image
image
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings