HPS masthead
What's New?
. Fukushima Decontamination Report
. CRCPD & CDC Grants for Volunteer Corps
. America's Nuclear Future
. February Newsletter
. Boice Nominated President of NCRP
. February Journal
. February ORS
. Schauer Given the Butterfly Award from Image Gently
. Kase President's Report to IRPA
. IRPA13 Accepting Posters
Upcoming Events
. HPS Midyear - Issues in Waste Management
5-8 February 2012
Dallas, Texas
. NRC Regulatory Information Conference
NRC Regulatory Information Conference
13-15 March 2012
Rockville, Maryland
. NCRP Annual Meeting
12-13 March 2012
Washington, DC
. James E. Turner Memorial Symposium
Call for Abstracts
18-19 April 2012
Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Pollard Auditorium, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
. IRPA13
13-18 May 2012
Glasgow, Scotland
. Canadian Radiation Protection Association (CRPA) Annual Meeting
27-30 May 2012
Halifax, Nova Scotia
. ACS Undergrad Summer Schools
10 June- 20 July 2012
. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Meeting Webcasts
February 2012
Bethesda, Maryland
09 February 2012

Answer to Question #1325 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Suntanning

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q
I need to make a table that shows a correlation between electron beam energy (kGy) and ultraviolet (UV)—sun exposure for the same amount of time, if we assume we expose the same thickness of mass. I know the mechanism is different, but I would like to have a few values to show the equivalent for absorption in each case. For example: for 1.5 min 0.5kGy . . .? UV rams 0.75kGy . . .? UV rams 1.0kGy . . .? UV rams and so on up to 5 kGy.
A
As you've noted, the radiation absorbed dose and damage mechanisms from an ionizing radiation, such as an electron beam, is not directly comparable to that from nonionizing radiation, such as ultraviolet (UV) radiation. However, in this case the end point erythema may appear to be the same. I suspect you are doing this for discussions with patients undergoing radiation therapy, where skin reddening is a common side effect. If you're looking at the biological effects of UV radiation, you may wish to get a copy of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Report No. 3 on "Optical Radiations in Medicine." This report notes that "at the wavelength of maximum sensitivity for production of erythema (295 nm), the minimal erythema dose (MED) is 50 joules per square meter. If this energy is absorbed in the outer 60 micrometers of skin, the 'absorbed dose' is equivalent to 100,000 rads!" The AAPM reports are available free to members, but for sale to nonmembers. David J. Allard, CHP
Answer posted on 7 November 2001. The information and material posted on this website is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Website. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
image
image
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings