HPS masthead
search
What's New?
. December Journal
. December Newsletter
. Online Registration for HPS 2010 Midyear Meeting Now Available
. NRC Academic Program Nuclear Education Grants, FY2010, Now Accepting Applications
. EPA's STAR Graduate and GRO Undergraduate Fellowship Funding Now Accepting Applications
Upcoming Events
. 2010 HPS Midyear Topical Meeting
Radiation Risk Communication to the Public
24-27 January 2010
Albuquerque, NM
. 2010 HPS Professional Development School
Radiation Risk Communication: Issues and Solutions
27-29 January 2010
Albuquerque, NM
21 November 2009

Answer to Question #1379 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Environmental and Background Radiation — Water

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q
What are the effects of drinking water containing uranium?
A
Ingested uranium has two types of effects:

  1. Chemical toxicity. Uranium is a heavy metal and, like lead, is toxic. In sufficient doses it can cause serious illness or even death within a short time. This effect is deterministic; that is, it occurs in every individual who gets a sufficient dose, and its severity is proportional to dose.
     
  2. Uranium is radioactive. It emits alpha particles, which produce a dense pattern of ionization but over a very short range in tissue—little more than the thickness of a sheet of paper. In sufficient doses it can produce delayed effects. Cancer can occur years to decades later. Mutations can, in theory, be expressed in some future generation.

Both of these effects are stochastic in nature; that is, their probability of occurrence is proportional to dose. There is currently debate in the scientific literature regarding the possible presence of a threshold dose, below which these effects do not occur. It is not clear at this time whether this threshold exists; if it does, it is at a low level. Because of these effects, we should make all reasonable effort to eliminate uranium in the drinking water and food chain. This does not necessarily mean, however, that we should devote massive effort and money to elimination of a very low concentration. We could be ignoring more serious threats. S. Julian Gibbs, DDS, PhD

Answer posted on 9 November 2001. The information and material posted on this Web site is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Web site. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings