HPS masthead
What's New?
. Fukushima Decontamination Report
. CRCPD & CDC Grants for Volunteer Corps
. America's Nuclear Future
. February Newsletter
. Boice Nominated President of NCRP
. February Journal
. February ORS
. Schauer Given the Butterfly Award from Image Gently
. Kase President's Report to IRPA
. IRPA13 Accepting Posters
Upcoming Events
. HPS Midyear - Issues in Waste Management
5-8 February 2012
Dallas, Texas
. NRC Regulatory Information Conference
NRC Regulatory Information Conference
13-15 March 2012
Rockville, Maryland
. NCRP Annual Meeting
12-13 March 2012
Washington, DC
. James E. Turner Memorial Symposium
Call for Abstracts
18-19 April 2012
Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Pollard Auditorium, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
. IRPA13
13-18 May 2012
Glasgow, Scotland
. Canadian Radiation Protection Association (CRPA) Annual Meeting
27-30 May 2012
Halifax, Nova Scotia
. ACS Undergrad Summer Schools
10 June- 20 July 2012
. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Meeting Webcasts
February 2012
Bethesda, Maryland
09 February 2012

Answer to Question #1389 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Instrumentation and Measurements — Instrument Calibration (IC)

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q
Would you please introduce me to some references concerning "the effect of photomultiplier thickness on its efficiency?"
A
You will need to contact the photomultiplier tube (PMT) manufacturer for technical data on a particular type. The factors that could impact a PMT "efficiency" include photocathode glass thickness, light attenuation in the scintillator, electron emitter coating material composition (for example, bialkali), optical coupling, electron multiplication, counting electronics, etc., all of which will impact observed electrical pulse output detection. The scintillation light pulse detection "efficiency," in pulses per detected radiation, will no doubt also depend on the incident radiation type, fraction of energy deposition, scintillator emission spectra (that is, for NaI, CsI, ZnS, plastic, glass, etc.), and matching to the spectral sensitivity of the photocathode. If your concern is thickness of the scintillator, that too will impact efficiency. In the common case of gamma-ray detection with NaI scintillators, the thinner crystals are better for the low-energy photons (for example, from 125I or 241Am), while the thicker crystals are used for the higher-energy emitters such as 137Cs and 60Co. A good introduction text is Radiation Detection and Measurement by Glenn Knoll (John Wiley & Sons, New York). David J. Allard, CHP
Answer posted on 12 November 2001. The information and material posted on this website is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Website. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
image
image
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings