HPS masthead
What's New?
. Fukushima Decontamination Report
. CRCPD & CDC Grants for Volunteer Corps
. America's Nuclear Future
. February Newsletter
. Boice Nominated President of NCRP
. February Journal
. February ORS
. Schauer Given the Butterfly Award from Image Gently
. Kase President's Report to IRPA
. IRPA13 Accepting Posters
Upcoming Events
. HPS Midyear - Issues in Waste Management
5-8 February 2012
Dallas, Texas
. NRC Regulatory Information Conference
NRC Regulatory Information Conference
13-15 March 2012
Rockville, Maryland
. NCRP Annual Meeting
12-13 March 2012
Washington, DC
. James E. Turner Memorial Symposium
Call for Abstracts
18-19 April 2012
Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Pollard Auditorium, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
. IRPA13
13-18 May 2012
Glasgow, Scotland
. Canadian Radiation Protection Association (CRPA) Annual Meeting
27-30 May 2012
Halifax, Nova Scotia
. ACS Undergrad Summer Schools
10 June- 20 July 2012
. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Meeting Webcasts
February 2012
Bethesda, Maryland
09 February 2012

Answer to Question #1405 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Instrumentation and Measurements — Surveys and Measurements (SM)

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q
If you are looking for a thin pencil beam of gamma radiation with a Geiger-Mueller (GM) detector, is the dose response averaged over the volume of the GM detector, so the response depends on the tube size, or is it the same regardless of the tube size?
A

This is a very good Geiger-Mueller (GM) tube question. With low count rates and no dead-time loss, a monoenergetic beam, and a uniformly irradiated detector, a particular GM tube's response in cpm per mR h-1 (or μGy h-1 to air) is a function of its active cross-sectional area. Manufacturers publish such response data for the various style GM tubes (for example, a "pancake" GM tube is about 3,500 cpm per mR h-1 for 137Cs). Thus, to correct for under response, you need to know the beam area and cross-sectional area of the "active length or window" of the GM tube in question. Specifically, the narrow gamma-ray beam is only producing secondary electrons from that area of the GM tube wall and resulting in a count rate lower than if the GM tube was uniformly irradiated. This is a common problem with the measurement of x rays streaming through a small housing gap or shielding void with analytical x-ray equipment. The Health Physics Society has just published ANSI Standard N43.2-2001 on the safety of analytical x-ray equipment. Section A.4.2 of the N43.2-2001 discusses using the ratio of the detector to beam areas as a multiplicative scaling factor to correct this underresponse. This ANSI standard is on the Health Physics Society website, free to members.

David J. Allard, CHP

Answer posted on 13 November 2001. The information and material posted on this website is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Website. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
image
image
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings