HPS masthead
What's New?
. Fukushima Decontamination Report
. CRCPD & CDC Grants for Volunteer Corps
. America's Nuclear Future
. February Newsletter
. Boice Nominated President of NCRP
. February Journal
. February ORS
. Schauer Given the Butterfly Award from Image Gently
. Kase President's Report to IRPA
. IRPA13 Accepting Posters
Upcoming Events
. HPS Midyear - Issues in Waste Management
5-8 February 2012
Dallas, Texas
. NRC Regulatory Information Conference
NRC Regulatory Information Conference
13-15 March 2012
Rockville, Maryland
. NCRP Annual Meeting
12-13 March 2012
Washington, DC
. James E. Turner Memorial Symposium
Call for Abstracts
18-19 April 2012
Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Pollard Auditorium, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
. IRPA13
13-18 May 2012
Glasgow, Scotland
. Canadian Radiation Protection Association (CRPA) Annual Meeting
27-30 May 2012
Halifax, Nova Scotia
. ACS Undergrad Summer Schools
10 June- 20 July 2012
. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Meeting Webcasts
February 2012
Bethesda, Maryland
09 February 2012

Answer to Question #1495 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Radiation Effects — Hiroshima and Nagasaki

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q
A 14-year-old gentleman was on a train that drove through Hiroshima 18 months after the atomic bomb. The train drove slowly through town; it took about 20 minutes to a half hour to drive through. He doesn't remember whether or not his window was open, though he could have opened it. How much radiation might he have been exposed to, and is it possible he may yet see the effects?
A
It is very unlikely that the 14-year-old gentleman to whom you refer received any significant radiation dose, certainly not a dose that would likely result in any biological effects now or in the future. Remember that people had been living in Hiroshima continuously for all those months after the atomic bombing and hence had a very much longer exposure time to any residual radioactivity from the bombings than the gentleman you mention. Long-term follow-up studies of these people do not indicate any significant effects at the dose levels they incurred from the residual activity.

So what dose did the gentleman incur from his 20-to-30-minute train trip through the city? Likely a very small fraction of the dose he would normally receive from cosmic rays and natural radioactivity in the environment in a year, and really too small to be distinguished from the variations in the natural radiation environment. Or, by way of another comparison, very much less than the dose from a chest x ray. Tell the man, who would now be nearly 60 years old, not to worry.

Ron Kathren, CHP
Answer posted on 14 December 2001. The information and material posted on this website is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Website. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
image
image
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings