HPS masthead
search
What's New?
. December Journal
. December Newsletter
. Online Registration for HPS 2010 Midyear Meeting Now Available
. NRC Academic Program Nuclear Education Grants, FY2010, Now Accepting Applications
. EPA's STAR Graduate and GRO Undergraduate Fellowship Funding Now Accepting Applications
Upcoming Events
. 2010 HPS Midyear Topical Meeting
Radiation Risk Communication to the Public
24-27 January 2010
Albuquerque, NM
. 2010 HPS Professional Development School
Radiation Risk Communication: Issues and Solutions
27-29 January 2010
Albuquerque, NM
20 November 2009

Answer to Question #1633 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Consumer Products — Radioactive Ceramics

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q
A follow-up from one of my previous questions about uranium glazes in older ceramics: what would be your best guess as to the dose in rem that a person would receive if they still used one of these ceramics as dinnerware and what would an antique collector's dose be from a ceramic, say sitting on the table in the kitchen? What type of activity do these old ceramic pieces with uranium glaze have; are we talking nanocuries or millicuries?
A
The following information comes from NUREG-1717 "Systematic Radiological Assessment of Exemptions for Source and Byproduct Materials" (2001). There is little available information about the total uranium activity found in the dinnerware that employed uranium-containing glaze. The levels used in the glaze are known, but the amount of glaze per plate, cup, or whatever, is not well known. One estimate put the figure at 4.5 grams of uranium in one plate. Obviously, the larger the plate and the greater the amount of glaze, the higher the activity. This one estimate of 4.5 grams of uranium translates into approximately 1.5 microcuries of uranium, that is, 1.5 microcuries of 238U (alpha emitter), 1.5 microcuries of 234Th (beta emitter), and 1.5 microcuries of 234mPa (beta emitter). If the glaze employed natural uranium, there would also be 1.5 microcuries of the alpha emitter 234U. If the glaze employed depleted uranium, relatively little 234U would be present. The gamma emissions from these nuclides are relatively low. As such, the largest exposure would be the beta dose to the hands. One estimate placed this at 0.5 to 20 mrad/h on contact. Handling the plates for 1.5 hours per day was estimated to result in 2 to 10 rem per year to the hands. Another estimate was that someone seated before a typical place setting would receive 3 mrad/h to the hands and approximately 0.3 mrad/h to the torso. NUREG-1717 did its own calculations and came up with an effective dose equivalent of 50 mrem per year to the maximally exposed user of such dinnerware—typical users would have substantially lower doses. Keep in mind that the NUREG number is an effective dose equivalent rather than a dose to the hands. For a homeowner who did not use the dinnerware, but simply had it on display, NUREG-1717 estimated the effective dose equivalent to be 0.06 mrem per year. Paul Frame, CHP, PhD
Answer posted on 31 January 2002. The information and material posted on this Web site is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Web site. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings