HPS masthead
What's New?
. Fukushima Decontamination Report
. CRCPD & CDC Grants for Volunteer Corps
. America's Nuclear Future
. February Newsletter
. Boice Nominated President of NCRP
. February Journal
. February ORS
. Schauer Given the Butterfly Award from Image Gently
. Kase President's Report to IRPA
. IRPA13 Accepting Posters
Upcoming Events
. HPS Midyear - Issues in Waste Management
5-8 February 2012
Dallas, Texas
. NRC Regulatory Information Conference
NRC Regulatory Information Conference
13-15 March 2012
Rockville, Maryland
. NCRP Annual Meeting
12-13 March 2012
Washington, DC
. James E. Turner Memorial Symposium
Call for Abstracts
18-19 April 2012
Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Pollard Auditorium, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
. IRPA13
13-18 May 2012
Glasgow, Scotland
. Canadian Radiation Protection Association (CRPA) Annual Meeting
27-30 May 2012
Halifax, Nova Scotia
. ACS Undergrad Summer Schools
10 June- 20 July 2012
. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Meeting Webcasts
February 2012
Bethesda, Maryland
08 February 2012

Answer to Question #1635 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Policy, Guidelines, and Regulations — ALARA

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q
My facility uses small capsule-sealed sources of 57Co (3-10 mCi), and 99mTc sources from 400 µCi to 25 mCi. We also have an americium sealed source of 5 mCi. All are handled with the usual ALARA principles and according to standard radiation protection procedures. I have now been told that americium is "special" and requires extra precautions to prevent corneal damage. This doesn't make sense to me; is it true? Is americium really so different from other gamma emitters?
A
You are correct in that handling americium is no different from handling any other potential internal contaminant, and would be subject to similar precautions, except for the fact that the quantities involved for a given level of hazard are much smaller for americium than for most other radionuclides. Although 241Am contains alphas, electrons (betas), and gammas, for the most part it is used for its very low-energy gammas, at around 60 keV for calibration and industrial uses.

As with any type of sealed radiation source, the common health physics practices of time, distance, and shielding, coupled with your ALARA principles, should be all that you need.

Ronald Kathren, CHP
Answer posted on 1 March 2002. The information and material posted on this website is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Website. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
image
image
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings