HPS masthead
What's New?
. Fukushima Decontamination Report
. CRCPD & CDC Grants for Volunteer Corps
. America's Nuclear Future
. February Newsletter
. Boice Nominated President of NCRP
. February Journal
. February ORS
. Schauer Given the Butterfly Award from Image Gently
. Kase President's Report to IRPA
. IRPA13 Accepting Posters
Upcoming Events
. HPS Midyear - Issues in Waste Management
5-8 February 2012
Dallas, Texas
. NRC Regulatory Information Conference
NRC Regulatory Information Conference
13-15 March 2012
Rockville, Maryland
. NCRP Annual Meeting
12-13 March 2012
Washington, DC
. James E. Turner Memorial Symposium
Call for Abstracts
18-19 April 2012
Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Pollard Auditorium, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
. IRPA13
13-18 May 2012
Glasgow, Scotland
. Canadian Radiation Protection Association (CRPA) Annual Meeting
27-30 May 2012
Halifax, Nova Scotia
. ACS Undergrad Summer Schools
10 June- 20 July 2012
. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Meeting Webcasts
February 2012
Bethesda, Maryland
08 February 2012

Answer to Question #1697 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Consumer Products — Watches, Clocks, and other Glow-in-the-Dark

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q
I have a 1960s-era watch that I like very much, but it has radium on the hands and dial. I measure (with a Victoreen model 450 survey meter) 37µR six inches away from the front of the watch, and 37µR one inch away from the back. With an ordinary Geiger counter, I get ~3,000 cps on the front and ~50 cps on the back. I am fond of this watch and like to wear it, but I do not know whether this is a safe "dose" if I wear it for 8-10 hours a day. I know not to open it up to avoid alpha exposure. I also do not wear it to bed. Can someone give me an answer please?
A
First, a few comments about the measurement and the activity of the radium. From my experience, the pressurized version of the Victoreen 450, the version that reads out in µR/hr, does not seem to be particularly accurate at this low exposure rate—even when the instrument has been recently calibrated. Furthermore, for the measurement to be accurate, the radiation field needs to be uniform throughout the detector volume. This condition does not exist given the large detector volume of the chamber and the closeness of the latter to the source. Having said that, the measurement at 6 inches (assuming that background, ca. 10 µR/h, was subtracted out) is consistent with the typical activity expected in such a watch: a fraction of a microcurie. The doses that have been reported for wearers of such watches are difficult to interpret for a number of reasons; for example, the exposure is very nonuniform and the assumptions about the depth and area over which the dose is calculated are not usually specified. The average "genetically significant dose" (that to the gonads) has been estimated by various authors to be 1.2, 3.3 , 2.6, 1.5, and 0.5 to 1.0 mrem per year (Robinson 1968). For a watch containing 1 µCi of 226Ra, the gonadal dose has been estimated to be 65 to 130 mrem per year if the watch were worn 24 hours per day. Doses to the forearms will be many times higher. Estimates reported by Robinson ranged from 122 mrem per year (for 0.002 µCi) up to 270,000 mrem per year (for 4.5 µCi). Have any effects been observed due to the wearing of radium-containing watches? Not to my knowledge. Would I wear one? Probably not. But then again, I haven't worn a wristwatch in over 40 years. There are many health physicists who would love to wear one if for no other reason than the fun of seeing it set off a counter. Had one of them answered this question, you would have received a very different answer. The bottom line is that it is your decision. Even if it were possible to calculate a meaningful dose due to the wearing of your watch, and even if we knew how to convert that into a risk, we could still disagree over what is meant by safe. Reference: Robinson, EW. The use of radium in consumer products. MORP 68-5, Public Health Service; 1968. Paul Frame, CHP, PhD
Answer posted on 1 March 2002. The information and material posted on this website is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Website. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
image
image
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings