HPS masthead
What's New?
. Fukushima Decontamination Report
. CRCPD & CDC Grants for Volunteer Corps
. America's Nuclear Future
. February Newsletter
. Boice Nominated President of NCRP
. February Journal
. February ORS
. Schauer Given the Butterfly Award from Image Gently
. Kase President's Report to IRPA
. IRPA13 Accepting Posters
Upcoming Events
. HPS Midyear - Issues in Waste Management
5-8 February 2012
Dallas, Texas
. NRC Regulatory Information Conference
NRC Regulatory Information Conference
13-15 March 2012
Rockville, Maryland
. NCRP Annual Meeting
12-13 March 2012
Washington, DC
. James E. Turner Memorial Symposium
Call for Abstracts
18-19 April 2012
Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Pollard Auditorium, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
. IRPA13
13-18 May 2012
Glasgow, Scotland
. Canadian Radiation Protection Association (CRPA) Annual Meeting
27-30 May 2012
Halifax, Nova Scotia
. ACS Undergrad Summer Schools
10 June- 20 July 2012
. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Meeting Webcasts
February 2012
Bethesda, Maryland
09 February 2012

Answer to Question #1748 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Radiation Workers

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q
Which organs and tissues are more sensitive to dental radiation? In film badge monitoring what procedure should be followed if the report shows an exposure?
A

There is no difference in sensitivity of any organ or tissue to dental radiation than that from any other source. The major organs at risk from dental radiation are those that are included in the primary x-ray beam—just as for any partial-body radiation. Those known radiosensitive organs which receive most of the dose from dental radiation include thyroid, salivary glands, and red bone marrow (the cervical spine plus a little in the mandible). All occupationally exposed radiation workers whose dose is monitored might be expected to get small doses from their work. In the healing arts, these doses are a small fraction of the occupational dose limit now in effect. In these cases, no action is required—except when a major increase in measured dose occurs or one worker gets much more than others doing the same job. In these cases, the first response is a search for the cause of the sudden excessive exposure. Usually it can be found. Only if the dose is in excess of the prescribed limit is further action required. In very drastic cases a worker could be reassigned to a job with less (or no) exposure to radiation.

S. Julian Gibbs, DDS, PhD

Answer posted on 18 March 2002. The information and material posted on this website is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Website. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
image
image
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings