HPS masthead
search
What's New?
. December Journal
. December Newsletter
. Online Registration for HPS 2010 Midyear Meeting Now Available
. NRC Academic Program Nuclear Education Grants, FY2010, Now Accepting Applications
. EPA's STAR Graduate and GRO Undergraduate Fellowship Funding Now Accepting Applications
Upcoming Events
. 2010 HPS Midyear Topical Meeting
Radiation Risk Communication to the Public
24-27 January 2010
Albuquerque, NM
. 2010 HPS Professional Development School
Radiation Risk Communication: Issues and Solutions
27-29 January 2010
Albuquerque, NM
21 November 2009

Answer to Question #1764 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Environmental and Background Radiation — Airplanes

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q
For pilots flying below 6,000 feet for about 200 hours a year is there any danger from cosmic radiation? I know the annual dosage should not exceed 1 millisievert per annum (according to the UK Air Navigation Order) but what would the dosage be at or below 6,000 feet? Many thanks. Bob Bewley
A
Even at ground level, cosmic radiation is part of our normal environment. The Earth's atmosphere absorbs this radiation, so its intensity is least at ground level. The altitude of interest in this question, 6,000 feet (1,800 m), is, of course, ground level in many places. Using the CARI-6 program available from the Federal Aviation Administration, I calculated the cosmic ray dose rate at this altitude at high geographic latitude to be about 0.1 microsievert per hour. It would, therefore, require 10,000 hours of flying at this altitude to reach the 1 millisievert annual limit recommended as a maximum for members of the public exposed to ionizing radiation. It should also be noted that exposures well above this 1 mSv limit are not "dangerous." Radiation workers are allowed 20 times this level in the European Union, and that limit is not even close to a threshold of measurable harm. It is only an administrative level set so that the expected incidence of risk to any individual in the whole exposed worker population would be comparable to other work-related injuries that can occur in any occupation.

Robert J. Barish, PhD, CHP, DABR, DABMP, FAAPM
Answer posted on 21 March 2002. The information and material posted on this Web site is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Web site. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings