HPS masthead
What's New?
. Fukushima Decontamination Report
. CRCPD & CDC Grants for Volunteer Corps
. America's Nuclear Future
. February Newsletter
. Boice Nominated President of NCRP
. February Journal
. February ORS
. Schauer Given the Butterfly Award from Image Gently
. Kase President's Report to IRPA
. IRPA13 Accepting Posters
Upcoming Events
. HPS Midyear - Issues in Waste Management
5-8 February 2012
Dallas, Texas
. NRC Regulatory Information Conference
NRC Regulatory Information Conference
13-15 March 2012
Rockville, Maryland
. NCRP Annual Meeting
12-13 March 2012
Washington, DC
. James E. Turner Memorial Symposium
Call for Abstracts
18-19 April 2012
Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Pollard Auditorium, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
. IRPA13
13-18 May 2012
Glasgow, Scotland
. Canadian Radiation Protection Association (CRPA) Annual Meeting
27-30 May 2012
Halifax, Nova Scotia
. ACS Undergrad Summer Schools
10 June- 20 July 2012
. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Meeting Webcasts
February 2012
Bethesda, Maryland
08 February 2012

Answer to Question #2114 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Pregnancy and Radiation — Conception after exposures

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q
I recently had an x ray done from my hips to my ankles on both legs. I was told that I couldn't wear a lead protector. I am not pregnant, but I am very concerned about the risks of FUTURE fertility problems and birth defects from being exposed to radiation through two x rays without a lead protector. I would very much appreciate some assistance in my quest for answers. Thank you.
A
You did not provide your age or your planned schedule for having children. Thus this answer must be in general terms. Leaded aprons for patient protection were recommended many years ago. At that time, film systems required rather large exposures. X-ray beams were frequently not restricted to the area being imaged. Thus, sensitive organs such as ovaries may have been included in x-ray beams aimed for other areas, such as your legs. At present, imaging systems, whether film or digital, are much more sensitive and require much smaller doses. Regulations in place for more than 20 years require that x-ray beams be restricted to the area being imaged. That means that organs outside the area being imaged receive only scattered radiation, the intensity of which is greatly reduced from that of the primary beam. Using current technology, the dose to your ovaries from imaging your legs is immeasurably small whether a leaded apron is used or not. There is no measurable reduction when the apron is added. Further, the radiation dose required to impair future fertility is hundreds, if not thousands, of times greater than you received from imaging your legs.


Conclusion: There is no reason for concern regarding future children resulting from your radiation exposure.

S. Julian Gibbs, DDS, PhD
Answer posted on 9 April 2003. The information and material posted on this website is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Website. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
image
image
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings