HPS masthead
search
What's New?
September Journal
September Newsletter
Granite Countertops and Radiation - HPS Response and Information Sheet
Upcoming Events
IRPA 12
19-24 October 2008
HPS Midyear Meeting
Recent Advances in Planning and Response to Radiation Emergencies
31 January - 3 February 2009
San Antonio, Texas
54th Annual Meeting of the Health Physics Society
12-16 July 2009
Minneapolis, Minnesota
29 August 2008

Answer to Question #2114 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Pregnancy and Radiation — Conception after exposures

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q
I recently had an x ray done from my hips to my ankles on both legs. I was told that I couldn't wear a lead protector. I am not pregnant, but I am very concerned about the risks of FUTURE fertility problems and birth defects from being exposed to radiation through two x rays without a lead protector. I would very much appreciate some assistance in my quest for answers. Thank you.
A
You did not provide your age or your planned schedule for having children. Thus this answer must be in general terms. Leaded aprons for patient protection were recommended many years ago. At that time, film systems required rather large exposures. X-ray beams were frequently not restricted to the area being imaged. Thus, sensitive organs such as ovaries may have been included in x-ray beams aimed for other areas, such as your legs. At present, imaging systems, whether film or digital, are much more sensitive and require much smaller doses. Regulations in place for more than 20 years require that x-ray beams be restricted to the area being imaged. That means that organs outside the area being imaged receive only scattered radiation, the intensity of which is greatly reduced from that of the primary beam. Using current technology, the dose to your ovaries from imaging your legs is immeasurably small whether a leaded apron is used or not. There is no measurable reduction when the apron is added. Further, the radiation dose required to impair future fertility is hundreds, if not thousands, of times greater than you received from imaging your legs.


Conclusion: There is no reason for concern regarding future children resulting from your radiation exposure.

S. Julian Gibbs, DDS, PhD
Answer posted on 9 April 2003. The information and material posted on this Web site is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Web site. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings