HPS masthead
What's New?
. Fukushima Decontamination Report
. CRCPD & CDC Grants for Volunteer Corps
. America's Nuclear Future
. February Newsletter
. Boice Nominated President of NCRP
. February Journal
. February ORS
. Schauer Given the Butterfly Award from Image Gently
. Kase President's Report to IRPA
. IRPA13 Accepting Posters
Upcoming Events
. HPS Midyear - Issues in Waste Management
5-8 February 2012
Dallas, Texas
. NRC Regulatory Information Conference
NRC Regulatory Information Conference
13-15 March 2012
Rockville, Maryland
. NCRP Annual Meeting
12-13 March 2012
Washington, DC
. James E. Turner Memorial Symposium
Call for Abstracts
18-19 April 2012
Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Pollard Auditorium, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
. IRPA13
13-18 May 2012
Glasgow, Scotland
. Canadian Radiation Protection Association (CRPA) Annual Meeting
27-30 May 2012
Halifax, Nova Scotia
. ACS Undergrad Summer Schools
10 June- 20 July 2012
. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Meeting Webcasts
February 2012
Bethesda, Maryland
09 February 2012

Answer to Question #2170 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Industrial Radiation — Industrial Applications

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q
Water was used to store a 60Co radiation source. My question is if the water will have radioactivity.
A

I assume that the 60Co source you are describing could accurately be referred to as a sealed source under the appropriate technical and legal criteria that defines such sources.

The radiation emitted from 60Co is not energetic enough to cause any type of nuclear transformation reactions if it is simply incident upon water. Therefore, it is unlikely that the water atoms themselves have become radioactive. If the integrity of the source housing was somehow lost it might be possible for radioactive atoms of cobalt to enter the water system you described. However, most sources are well designed, perhaps even over designed, so this too is unlikely. Further, those responsible for a particular source are required to check the source for leaks on a periodic basis. If it were leaking they would be required by law to take aggressive actions to contain the leak and handle the source and any radioactive material found in the water in a responsible fashion. So to answer your question directly, it is unlikely that the water will contain radioactive material or be radioactive once the 60Co source is removed. However, the only way to be absolutely certain is to analyze the water for the presence of radioactivity.

Richard R. Brey, PhD, CHP

Answer posted on 9 April 2003. The information and material posted on this website is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Website. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
image
image
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings