HPS masthead
What's New?
. Fukushima Decontamination Report
. CRCPD & CDC Grants for Volunteer Corps
. America's Nuclear Future
. February Newsletter
. Boice Nominated President of NCRP
. February Journal
. February ORS
. Schauer Given the Butterfly Award from Image Gently
. Kase President's Report to IRPA
. IRPA13 Accepting Posters
Upcoming Events
. HPS Midyear - Issues in Waste Management
5-8 February 2012
Dallas, Texas
. NRC Regulatory Information Conference
NRC Regulatory Information Conference
13-15 March 2012
Rockville, Maryland
. NCRP Annual Meeting
12-13 March 2012
Washington, DC
. James E. Turner Memorial Symposium
Call for Abstracts
18-19 April 2012
Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Pollard Auditorium, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
. IRPA13
13-18 May 2012
Glasgow, Scotland
. Canadian Radiation Protection Association (CRPA) Annual Meeting
27-30 May 2012
Halifax, Nova Scotia
. ACS Undergrad Summer Schools
10 June- 20 July 2012
. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Meeting Webcasts
February 2012
Bethesda, Maryland
09 February 2012

Answer to Question #2258 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Doses and Dose Calculations — External dose calculations

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q
I work daily in the lab with 32P (five days a week). We have and wear adequate protection (plexiglass of 1 cm and gloves and lab coat) but I do not have a wrist or ring dosimeter (I have a badge). My exposure is external. I am exposed for approximately 15-20 minutes to a concentrated form (stock of 32P is 1 mCi) and my manipulations take approximately two hours with a diluted form. I use 25.9 MBq as a working concentration a day. I would like to know how would I go about calculating my exposure to 32P. What is my dose rate or exposure rate? How do I convert from MBq to mSv/hr?
A
The question of what dose one receives from an external beta source has no simple answer.

The dose pattern in tissue irradiated by an external beta source is very non-uniform—it can vary significantly from point to point. There are several reasons for this. Beta particles are emitted from a source with all energies up to a maximum value. The particles travel in tortuous, rather than straight, paths through matter. Like other radiations, their intensity falls off geometrically with distance from the source. As a result, the dose delivered by an external beta source depends upon how the source is distributed and where one looks in the tissue. The dose is largest near the surface of the tissue and drops off to zero as one moves in any direction beyond the range of the particles. Any relative motion between the source and the irradiated tissue also affects the dose pattern. Under federal regulations for protection purposes, within ALARA the occupational exposure of an individual to external beta radiation is controlled by limiting the annual shallow dose equivalent (defined as the dose equivalent at a depth of 0.007 cm) to the skin or to any extremity to 50 rem and the annual dose equivalent to the lens of the eye (at a depth of 0.3 cm) to 15 rem. Accreditation procedures exist for dosimeters that can be calibrated to perform these tasks. The regulations also specify how dose-equivalent averaging over different areas of the exposed skin is to be carried out for control purposes.

There is no gamma radiation from 32P, and the beta particles would not be able to penetrate the 1 cm plexiglass you mention.

In response to your specific question—"How do I convert from MBq to mSv/h?"—I offer the following. The answer (which would probably be a pretty rough estimate) would depend upon where in the tissue you wanted to know the dose and upon the specific conditions of the exposure time and distances. You might, alternatively, be interested in an average dose, say over the first 2 mm of depth in a typical exposure situation. However, any such average would depend numerically on the conditions that define it. Rather than dealing with the complexities of beta dose, the two operational controls mentioned above are deemed adequate to prevent deterministic effects from occurring with exposure of the skin and lens of the eye.

James E. Turner, CHP, PhD
Answer posted on 9 April 2003. The information and material posted on this website is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Website. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
image
image
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings