HPS masthead
search
What's New?
. April Newsletter
. April Journal
PDF Radiological and Nuclear Preparedness - CDC Public Health Grand Rounds Session
Upcoming Events
. 2010 Summer Professional Development School
Internal Dosimetry
23 - 26 June 2010
Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho
. International Conference on Radiation Protection in Medicine
1-3 September 2010
Varna, Bulgaria
. 2010 Meeting of the Air Monitoring Users Group
4-7 May 2010
Las Vegas, NV
17 March 2010

Answer to Question #2387 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Medical and Dental Patient Issues — Diagnostic X Ray and CT

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q
How many head x rays are the limit in one sitting? I had four shots done to make sure I had no metal behind my eyes before I had an MRI (magnetic resonance imaging). Well, they took four and then figured out that they had bad exposure so they took three more. You would think they would check it after the first one. So, seven shots in one day . . . my head should be glowing now or what?
A
I understand your apprehension about the number of x-ray exams that you received, but actually, the skull x-ray exam gives a relatively small dose of radiation to your skull. To quantify the amount of radiation that you received it is necessary to use the term effective dose1. The effective dose is a measure of the effect that results from a uniform, whole-body exposure taking into account the relative radiosensitivity of the various organs and tissues exposed. The effective dose of one skull x-ray exam is between 0.01 and 0.02 mSv. So the amount of radiation from seven such films is simply seven times the average of 0.015 mSv, or about 0.1 mSv2. To put this in perspective, the normal amount of background radiation from the sun, outer space, and radioactive materials that are naturally found in the Earth’s air and soil is 3 mSv per year, which is over 30 times the amount of radiation that you received from the seven skull x-ray exams. To give you an appreciation for the magnitude of radiation in your x rays, from just one CT (computerized tomography) scan of your head, you would have received 2 mSv, or 20 times as much radiation. The MRI that you received does not involve ionizing radiation, and therefore does not add to any long-term risks that you may incur.

What could such risks be? Some interpretation of current research supports the theory that even low doses of ionizing radiation might increase your risk of cancer at some point in your life. The chance that anyone may get a fatal cancer is about 25% even if they receive no additional radiation beyond background levels. For an effective dose of 0.1 mSv, the risk is 0.004% greater than 25% or 25.004%. This increased risk is so slight as to not have any real meaning since natural variations are greater. I hope that this reassures you that although you may have received a slight amount more radiation from the extra x rays, the clinical information that was gained from the precaution far outweighs any risk of radiation that you might have received.

Jamey Lee West, MD
National Institute of Health

  1. ICRP Publication 60: 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, Annals of the ICRP Vol. 21/1-3, 1991, Pergamon Press
     
  2. BF Wall and D Hart, “Revised radiation doses for typical X-ray examinations. Report on a recent review of doses to patients from medical X-ray examinations in the UK by NRPB. National Radiological Protection Board: British Journal of Radiolology, 70: 437-439 (1997)

Editor’s note: The effective dose of 1 mSv is equivalent to a dose of 100 mrem.

Answer posted on 27 May 2003. The information and material posted on this Web site is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Web site. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings