HPS masthead
What's New?
. Fukushima Decontamination Report
. CRCPD & CDC Grants for Volunteer Corps
. America's Nuclear Future
. February Newsletter
. Boice Nominated President of NCRP
. February Journal
. February ORS
. Schauer Given the Butterfly Award from Image Gently
. Kase President's Report to IRPA
. IRPA13 Accepting Posters
Upcoming Events
. HPS Midyear - Issues in Waste Management
5-8 February 2012
Dallas, Texas
. NRC Regulatory Information Conference
NRC Regulatory Information Conference
13-15 March 2012
Rockville, Maryland
. NCRP Annual Meeting
12-13 March 2012
Washington, DC
. James E. Turner Memorial Symposium
Call for Abstracts
18-19 April 2012
Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Pollard Auditorium, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
. IRPA13
13-18 May 2012
Glasgow, Scotland
. Canadian Radiation Protection Association (CRPA) Annual Meeting
27-30 May 2012
Halifax, Nova Scotia
. ACS Undergrad Summer Schools
10 June- 20 July 2012
. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Meeting Webcasts
February 2012
Bethesda, Maryland
04 February 2012

Answer to Question #2440 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Pregnancy and Radiation — Radiation effects to embryo/fetus

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q
I recently had a HIDA (hepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid) Scan done for some problems I had been having. I just found that I am pregnant and had to have been pregnant when I had the test done, but probably just a few days along. What kind of effects could the HIDA Scan have on my unborn child?
A
Your embryo was in the earliest stages of development that is referred to as the "All or None period", because it is most resistant to the malforming effects of radiation. Secondly because of the nature of the diagnostic studies, the embryo received a very low exposure, because the gall bladder x rays do not expose the embryo to radiation. Only a very small amount of scatter radiation will have reached the embryo. You did not tell me the amount of technetium that was administered in mCi (millicuries). However, since it was a diagnostic test it also should have only exposed the embryo to a very low dose. Summing up, the exposure should be well below the upper limit that would concern us and your risks for birth defects and miscarriage would be the background risks providing that you do not have other reproductive problems or a family history of reproductive problems. These background risks are 3% for birth effects and 15 % for miscarriage. Good luck with your pregnancy.

Robert Brent MD, PhD, DSc
Answer posted on 9 April 2003. The information and material posted on this website is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Website. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
image
image
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings