HPS masthead
What's New?
. Fukushima Decontamination Report
. CRCPD & CDC Grants for Volunteer Corps
. America's Nuclear Future
. February Newsletter
. Boice Nominated President of NCRP
. February Journal
. February ORS
. Schauer Given the Butterfly Award from Image Gently
. Kase President's Report to IRPA
. IRPA13 Accepting Posters
Upcoming Events
. HPS Midyear - Issues in Waste Management
5-8 February 2012
Dallas, Texas
. NRC Regulatory Information Conference
NRC Regulatory Information Conference
13-15 March 2012
Rockville, Maryland
. NCRP Annual Meeting
12-13 March 2012
Washington, DC
. James E. Turner Memorial Symposium
Call for Abstracts
18-19 April 2012
Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Pollard Auditorium, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
. IRPA13
13-18 May 2012
Glasgow, Scotland
. Canadian Radiation Protection Association (CRPA) Annual Meeting
27-30 May 2012
Halifax, Nova Scotia
. ACS Undergrad Summer Schools
10 June- 20 July 2012
. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Meeting Webcasts
February 2012
Bethesda, Maryland
09 February 2012

Answer to Question #2452 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Instrumentation and Measurements — Instrument Calibration (IC)

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q
Is there a reference document that states a requirement for the length of time background measurements are to be made for a gamma spectroscopy system? In a recent audit I was informed that for statistical purposes it was necessary to run the weekly background for 1,000 minutes.
A
You're obviously looking for certain minimum detectable activity levels and want a good handle on background. I'm not aware of any "requirement" for a weekly 1,000-minute check on background for gamma spectroscopy. This sounds like a significant period of the available counting time in a seven-day week. Depending on sample workload it should be possible to do this 1,000-minute count over a weekend, setting up to run at the end of the day on Friday. Once you have documented a stable background on a particular system, it would not be unreasonable to do monthly or quarterly 1,000-minute background counts, with shorter-duration weekly quality-control background checks. I'd check your background control charts for stability, look at the government protocols referenced in this topical area of ATE, and contact other gamma-counting labs. If you need contacts, let me know.

David J. Allard, CHP
Answer posted on 9 April 2003. The information and material posted on this website is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Website. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
image
image
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings