HPS masthead
What's New?
. Fukushima Decontamination Report
. CRCPD & CDC Grants for Volunteer Corps
. America's Nuclear Future
. February Newsletter
. Boice Nominated President of NCRP
. February Journal
. February ORS
. Schauer Given the Butterfly Award from Image Gently
. Kase President's Report to IRPA
. IRPA13 Accepting Posters
Upcoming Events
. HPS Midyear - Issues in Waste Management
5-8 February 2012
Dallas, Texas
. NRC Regulatory Information Conference
NRC Regulatory Information Conference
13-15 March 2012
Rockville, Maryland
. NCRP Annual Meeting
12-13 March 2012
Washington, DC
. James E. Turner Memorial Symposium
Call for Abstracts
18-19 April 2012
Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Pollard Auditorium, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
. IRPA13
13-18 May 2012
Glasgow, Scotland
. Canadian Radiation Protection Association (CRPA) Annual Meeting
27-30 May 2012
Halifax, Nova Scotia
. ACS Undergrad Summer Schools
10 June- 20 July 2012
. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Meeting Webcasts
February 2012
Bethesda, Maryland
09 February 2012

Answer to Question #2476 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Instrumentation and Measurements — Instrument Calibration (IC)

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q
I have a piece of lithium glass (GS-20) (3" in diameter and 3 mm in thickness) with which I can count neutrons. I want to find a calibration method for this equipment to convert the neutron counts into neutron dose. How should I proceed? I have the MCNP (Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code); can I simulate the conversion factor? Or, does it has to be done experimentally?
A
First, neutron dosimetry and measurements are no doubt worthy of a half a semester of a graduate-level health physics course. Nonetheless, the Li-6 neutron–alpha reaction is often used in enriched Li-6 loaded glass, or TLD materials for neutron detection. The interaction cross section will vary decreasingly by several orders of magnitude with increasing energy. Also, the neutron interaction, initial energy, with flux, will have a direct bearing dose. And in practice, one never has a monoenergetic neutron source to measure, so polyenergetic neutrons in some spectrum must be evaluated. Thus, one needs to design a moderator/detector assembly that will thermalize the higher-energy neutrons so they can be detected. But the detected flux at each energy interval will contribute differently to the absorbed dose and, when a radiation weighting factor is applied for biological effectiveness, also to the dose equivalent.

You should read through Knoll's text (noted as a reference in this topical area of ATE) on the subject first. Information on the Li glass cross section could be used to estimate response with the moderator you may wish to use. This could be simulated with the MCNP code, but you'd also want to benchmark that response with an experimental rem responding instrument measurement for the given radiation field you're interested in monitoring. See our Ask the Expert Q2477 also.

David J. Allard, CHP
Answer posted on 9 April 2003. The information and material posted on this website is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Website. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
image
image
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings