|
||||||||||||||||||
Answer to Question #2702 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"Category: Pregnancy and Radiation The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field: Q
My wife was suffering from lower backache and recently she was examined by an expert. After the x ray she was diagnosed as suffering from sclerosis on both sides of the lower one-third sacroiliac joint. Joint margins are normal. Unknowingly, at the time of the x ray she was five weeks pregnant. At the same time the doctor advised an MRI (magnetic resonance imaging). Please advise: (1) Is it harmful to go ahead with the MRI? (2) Are sclerosis and cancer the same deadly killers? (3) Should the pregnancy be terminated for treatment of sclerosis? (4) Was the x ray harmful?
A
I'll take the questions one at a time. Is it harmful to go ahead with MRI? There are no known fetal biological effects of magnetic fields used for diagnostic MRI scans.
Are sclerosis and cancer the same deadly killer? Sclerosis and cancer are not the same thing. What I wonder is whether you mean scoliosis—which is a condition of the bones, typically the spinal bones, and not sclerosis which is a disease that affects the brain and spinal cord. In any event, this is a question for you to ask your or another physician. I'm not qualified to answer.
Should pregnancy be terminated for treatment of sclerosis? Again, this is not a decision for me to make. This needs to be decided with additional information you can obtain from your physician about the disease.
Was the x ray harmful? You didn't say what type of x ray or how many were taken. I will assume one x ray was taken of the pelvic area, so the estimated fetal dose would be 0.2 rad according to a book by L.K. Wagner, et al., titled Exposure of the Pregnant Patient to Diagnostic Radiations (Medical Physics Publishing Madison, Wisconsin). The precise dose depends on the type of machine and techniques used as well as the size of the patient. According to recommendations in this book, there should be no concern below 15 rad.
In addition, the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements issued a statement saying that the risk of abnormality is considered negligible at 5 rad or less and the risk of malformation is increased if the doses exceed 15 rad. They went on to say that exposure of the fetus to radiation arising from diagnostic procedures would rarely be cause for terminating pregnancy.
I hope this information is useful in helping you make your decisions.
Kelly Classic
Certified Medical Health Physicist
Answer posted on 23 June 2003. The information and material posted on this website is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Website. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| This page last updated 27 August 2011. Ask Question | Search ATE | Site Map | Privacy Statement | Disclaimer | Webmaster | ||||||||||||||||||