HPS masthead
What's New?
. Fukushima Decontamination Report
. CRCPD & CDC Grants for Volunteer Corps
. America's Nuclear Future
. February Newsletter
. Boice Nominated President of NCRP
. February Journal
. February ORS
. Schauer Given the Butterfly Award from Image Gently
. Kase President's Report to IRPA
. IRPA13 Accepting Posters
Upcoming Events
. HPS Midyear - Issues in Waste Management
5-8 February 2012
Dallas, Texas
. NRC Regulatory Information Conference
NRC Regulatory Information Conference
13-15 March 2012
Rockville, Maryland
. NCRP Annual Meeting
12-13 March 2012
Washington, DC
. James E. Turner Memorial Symposium
Call for Abstracts
18-19 April 2012
Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Pollard Auditorium, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
. IRPA13
13-18 May 2012
Glasgow, Scotland
. Canadian Radiation Protection Association (CRPA) Annual Meeting
27-30 May 2012
Halifax, Nova Scotia
. ACS Undergrad Summer Schools
10 June- 20 July 2012
. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Meeting Webcasts
February 2012
Bethesda, Maryland
08 February 2012

Answer to Question #2703 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Pregnancy and Radiation — Conception after exposures

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q
My daughter was born in 1982 with a hip click. Recommendations were to double diaper to spread out her hips and legs. She also needed the pelvis region x rayed at separate intervals. Her ovaries were usually shielded with small shields. During one x ray, one of the shields did not cover the ovary (it was difficult to pinpoint where her ovary was over her diapers). It was a much older x-ray machine and wasn't used much. So one of her ovaries was exposed for a one-time x ray on an old-model machine. Knowing that all eggs are present in the ovary at time of birth (and not remembering which side was exposed), does she have to be concerned about an increased risk of birth defects or abnormalities in her children? She is 21 now. I haven't told her of this yet, but I feel I need to know, but want the facts so as to not cause her undue anxiety. She loves children and can't wait to have them. I'd appreciate any input or resources you can direct me to.
A
The likelihood of any problems with your daughter's future pregnancies due to radiation exposure 20 years ago is minimal, if any. All available data from both human experience and animal studies indicate that any damage produced by x rays, even in doses much greater than hers, is repaired within a few weeks. Even at large doses, only a fraction of the cells that would later develop into ova were damaged. The probability that one of these few potentially injured cells would produce a child is remote. The overwhelming probability favors no issues from her x rays. Kelly Classic Certified Medical Health Physicist
Answer posted on 26 June 2003. The information and material posted on this website is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Website. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
image
image
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings