HPS masthead
What's New?
. Fukushima Decontamination Report
. CRCPD & CDC Grants for Volunteer Corps
. America's Nuclear Future
. February Newsletter
. Boice Nominated President of NCRP
. February Journal
. February ORS
. Schauer Given the Butterfly Award from Image Gently
. Kase President's Report to IRPA
. IRPA13 Accepting Posters
Upcoming Events
. HPS Midyear - Issues in Waste Management
5-8 February 2012
Dallas, Texas
. NRC Regulatory Information Conference
NRC Regulatory Information Conference
13-15 March 2012
Rockville, Maryland
. NCRP Annual Meeting
12-13 March 2012
Washington, DC
. James E. Turner Memorial Symposium
Call for Abstracts
18-19 April 2012
Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Pollard Auditorium, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
. IRPA13
13-18 May 2012
Glasgow, Scotland
. Canadian Radiation Protection Association (CRPA) Annual Meeting
27-30 May 2012
Halifax, Nova Scotia
. ACS Undergrad Summer Schools
10 June- 20 July 2012
. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Meeting Webcasts
February 2012
Bethesda, Maryland
09 February 2012

Answer to Question #2834 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Instrumentation and Measurements — Instrument Calibration (IC)

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q

I have an Eberline ASP2e meter with a HP360 probe. It reads cpm. I have an item suspected to be contaminated with 232Th Fluoride. Readings are approximately 7,000 cpm. How can this number be interpreted to know if it is safe for people to be working with these items? How do I convert the reading if the probe's efficiency to 232Th is not known?

A

You should look at some of the other Q&A in this topical area of ATE. In particular, see Q2429 relating to calibration of alpha probes. With regard to your questions, you need to calibrate this probe with a traceable 232Th source for its respective 4.0 MeV alphas. Alternately, you might use a traceable depleted 238U source, where most of the alphas will be from 238U, and a lesser degree from 234U (which has a slightly higher alpha energy). Next you need to know the active area of the probe in square centimeters (cm2). With a calibration efficiency factor, you'll be able to convert from observed cpm to dpm and then scale to "expected" dpm per 100 cm2 from the known area of the probe. This can then be compared to recommended levels of 232Th contamination. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Reg. Guide 1.86, for release of surface-contaminated materials, gives a limit of 1,000 dpm/100 cm2 for 232Th. Given the intake concentrations for 232Th are quite low, and 232Th fluoride may be ingested or inhaled in a work setting, I would seek assistance from a professional health physicist.

David J. Allard, CHP

Answer posted on 11 September 2003. The information and material posted on this website is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Website. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
image
image
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings