HPS masthead
What's New?
. Fukushima Decontamination Report
. CRCPD & CDC Grants for Volunteer Corps
. America's Nuclear Future
. February Newsletter
. Boice Nominated President of NCRP
. February Journal
. February ORS
. Schauer Given the Butterfly Award from Image Gently
. Kase President's Report to IRPA
. IRPA13 Accepting Posters
Upcoming Events
. HPS Midyear - Issues in Waste Management
5-8 February 2012
Dallas, Texas
. NRC Regulatory Information Conference
NRC Regulatory Information Conference
13-15 March 2012
Rockville, Maryland
. NCRP Annual Meeting
12-13 March 2012
Washington, DC
. James E. Turner Memorial Symposium
Call for Abstracts
18-19 April 2012
Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Pollard Auditorium, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
. IRPA13
13-18 May 2012
Glasgow, Scotland
. Canadian Radiation Protection Association (CRPA) Annual Meeting
27-30 May 2012
Halifax, Nova Scotia
. ACS Undergrad Summer Schools
10 June- 20 July 2012
. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Meeting Webcasts
February 2012
Bethesda, Maryland
07 February 2012

Answer to Question #306 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Policy, Guidelines, and Regulations

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q
When source-checking portable survey instruments prior to use, is it acceptable to perform a source check at the end of shift if the instruments will not be used until the start of the next shift and that shift starts within 24 hours of the source check? If that second shift is such that continuous instrument use extends past 24 hours from the source check, is it unnecessary to perform an additional check?
A
It sounds like you are looking for an interpretation of ANSI N323-1978, which states, "A performance check shall be made prior to each use, during intermittent use conditions, and several times a day during continuous use." The good news is that the above standard has been replaced by ANSI-N323A-1997, "Radiation Protection Instrumentation Test and Calibration," which is less rigorous in the area of concern. The new standard labels the old performance test as a source response check and states, ". . . each instrument . . . shall be checked with a source during operation at least daily, or prior to each intermittent use, whichever is less frequent." For auditors, the main issue will likely be whether the radiation protection group of interest meets its own procedure requirements, rather than the exact definition of a day or shift. The reader should also be aware that calibration quality standards are higher in the new ANSI standard. Many labs do not come close to meeting the standard. The definition of a proper calibration will likely keep auditors busy for the next few years. For more information on ANSI Standards go to the American Nuclear Standards website.

Roger Schanzenbach, CHP
San Onofre Nuclear Station
The information and material posted on this website is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Website. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
image
image
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings