HPS masthead
What's New?
. Fukushima Decontamination Report
. CRCPD & CDC Grants for Volunteer Corps
. America's Nuclear Future
. February Newsletter
. Boice Nominated President of NCRP
. February Journal
. February ORS
. Schauer Given the Butterfly Award from Image Gently
. Kase President's Report to IRPA
. IRPA13 Accepting Posters
Upcoming Events
. HPS Midyear - Issues in Waste Management
5-8 February 2012
Dallas, Texas
. NRC Regulatory Information Conference
NRC Regulatory Information Conference
13-15 March 2012
Rockville, Maryland
. NCRP Annual Meeting
12-13 March 2012
Washington, DC
. James E. Turner Memorial Symposium
Call for Abstracts
18-19 April 2012
Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Pollard Auditorium, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
. IRPA13
13-18 May 2012
Glasgow, Scotland
. Canadian Radiation Protection Association (CRPA) Annual Meeting
27-30 May 2012
Halifax, Nova Scotia
. ACS Undergrad Summer Schools
10 June- 20 July 2012
. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Meeting Webcasts
February 2012
Bethesda, Maryland
09 February 2012

Answer to Question #337 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Doses and Dose Calculations — External dose calculations

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q
What is the conversion factor for 137Cs air exposure to rem (R to rem)corrected for phantom backscattering effect.
A
For 137Cs, the dose equivalent in rem is calculated by multiplying the free air exposure in R by 1.06. At this energy the conversions are the same for both deep dose equivalent (10 mm depth in an individual person's body) and shallow dose equivalent (0.07 mm depth). According to information presented in HPS N13.11-1993, The American National Standard for Dosimetry -- Personnel Dosimetry Performance -- Criteria for Testing, the 137Cs conversion from air kerma (Gy or rad) to dose equivalent (Sv or rem) is 1.21 rem/rad(air), and the suggested 137Cs air kerma to exposure equivalency is 0.878 rad(air kerma)/R. Thus: 1.21 rem/rad(air) x 0.878 rad(air)/R = 1.06 rem/R. This is slightly different from the value of 1.03 published 10 years earlier in ANSI N13.11-1983. Your reference to "phantom backscattering effect" suggests that your interest may be personnel dosimeter calibration. For personnel dosimeter calibration, the dosimeter should be placed at the surface of an appropriate phantom; the exposure (or air kerma) value is the value measured (or calculated) at the location of the center of the front surface of the phantom, but in the absence of a phantom. The corresponding dose equivalent value is the value expected at the appropriate depth in the body of an individual person if he or she was located at the position of the phantom.

Charles E. Roessler, CHP, PhD
Answer posted on 21 August 2000. The information and material posted on this website is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Website. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
image
image
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings