HPS masthead
search
What's New?
. December Journal
. December Newsletter
. Online Registration for HPS 2010 Midyear Meeting Now Available
. NRC Academic Program Nuclear Education Grants, FY2010, Now Accepting Applications
. EPA's STAR Graduate and GRO Undergraduate Fellowship Funding Now Accepting Applications
Upcoming Events
. 2010 HPS Midyear Topical Meeting
Radiation Risk Communication to the Public
24-27 January 2010
Albuquerque, NM
. 2010 HPS Professional Development School
Radiation Risk Communication: Issues and Solutions
27-29 January 2010
Albuquerque, NM
21 November 2009

Answer to Question #3399 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Environmental and Background Radiation — Water

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q
I enjoyed reading answer 484 in your Ask the Experts feature and have two questions/comments. I have an engineering background and I would like to see the calculations mentioned for the example discussed. I am thinking of moving to Lake Zurich, Illinois, and have found the Village of Lake Zurich, Illinois, Web site discussing its water quality. I would highly appreciate if you could comment on the safety of living there considering the the radiation level reported and the involved projects/contracts. In particular, let me know the safe approach there as far as drinking water, cultivating fruit trees (and consuming the fruit), and taking a shower is concerned.
A

Question 484 dealt with radium in drinking water and I suspect that the calculations you would like discussed are those that were used to convert the concentration of the radium into an annual dose equivalent and an associated risk. Ultimately, such a calculation involves assumptions about the amount of water consumed, the fraction of the radium absorbed into the blood, the ultimate distribution of that absorbed radium throughout the body and its residence time in the various tissues of the body, the energy deposited in those tissues by the radiation emitted during the decay of the radium, and the relative sensitivity of those tissues.

The simple approach, and, given the numerous uncertainties, a perfectly acceptable one, is to use dose factors of the sort published in Federal Guidance Report 11. This report can be found on the Environmental Protection Agency Web site. For radium-226 the dose factor is 3.58 X 10-7 sieverts (Sv) per becquerel (Bq) ingested. This more or less equates to 1.3 X 10-3 millirem per picocurie.

The answer to Question 484 assumed that 1.86 liters of water per day were consumed (perhaps something of an overestimate) and that the concentration of radium-226 in the drinking water was 6.4 picocuries per liter. In such a case, approximately 4,000 picocuries per year would be ingested. Using the aforementioned dose factor, I come up with an annual dose equivalent of a little over 5 millirem. This represents one to two percent of the 300 mrem per year (or thereabouts) that the average American receives due to natural radiation.

With regard to the estimated risk, the highly uncertain working assumption is the risk of dying due to radiation-induced cancer is approximately 5 X 10-7 (five in ten million) per millirem. As such, the risk due to drinking this water for one year would be roughly 2 or 3 in a million. Judging from the report you referenced, the situation in Lake Zurich would not be very different. If you are concerned about the safety of your drinking water, it would be easy to install a purifier in the water supply. You also asked about the impact of the radium in the water when it came to cultivating fruit trees (and consuming the fruit) and taking a shower. In these situations, the radium concentration in the water is really a nonissue. For further information regarding all of this, do not hesitate to contact your state authorities.

Paul Frame, CHP, PhD

Answer posted on 19 February 2004. The information and material posted on this Web site is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Web site. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings