HPS masthead
What's New?
. Fukushima Decontamination Report
. CRCPD & CDC Grants for Volunteer Corps
. America's Nuclear Future
. February Newsletter
. Boice Nominated President of NCRP
. February Journal
. February ORS
. Schauer Given the Butterfly Award from Image Gently
. Kase President's Report to IRPA
. IRPA13 Accepting Posters
Upcoming Events
. HPS Midyear - Issues in Waste Management
5-8 February 2012
Dallas, Texas
. NRC Regulatory Information Conference
NRC Regulatory Information Conference
13-15 March 2012
Rockville, Maryland
. NCRP Annual Meeting
12-13 March 2012
Washington, DC
. James E. Turner Memorial Symposium
Call for Abstracts
18-19 April 2012
Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Pollard Auditorium, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
. IRPA13
13-18 May 2012
Glasgow, Scotland
. Canadian Radiation Protection Association (CRPA) Annual Meeting
27-30 May 2012
Halifax, Nova Scotia
. ACS Undergrad Summer Schools
10 June- 20 July 2012
. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Meeting Webcasts
February 2012
Bethesda, Maryland
09 February 2012

Answer to Question #3447 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Instrumentation and Measurements — Instrument Calibration (IC)

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q
ANSI N323a-1997 Section 4.8 gives some guidance for performing source checks on instruments. It provides only for a tolerance of +/-20% (with an exception for high dose rate and neutron instruments). This criterion may be hard to meet, specifically for beta contamination survey instruments on the lower range due to variables such as background interference, needle fluctuation, source emission rates at low activity, etc. Is there additional guidance for this? Perhaps a -20%/+30% for this range or other allowances?
A

For most health physics instrumentation a tolerance of +/- 20% is the normal accuracy guidance; however, you should review the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) Report No. 112 "Calibration of Survey Instruments Used in Radiation Protection for the Assessment of Ionizing Radiation Fields and Radioactive Surface Contamination." Section 5.5 of this report notes "An uncertainty of +/- 30% may be allowed for Eres < 0.3 MeV . . ." with calibration of beta dose instruments. Similarly, Section 4.5 notes the same for air kerma rates below 10 µGy per hour for photon measuring instruments used for external radiation field evaluation.

David J. Allard, CHP

Answer posted on 1 March 2004. The information and material posted on this website is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Website. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
image
image
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings