HPS masthead
What's New?
. Fukushima Decontamination Report
. CRCPD & CDC Grants for Volunteer Corps
. America's Nuclear Future
. February Newsletter
. Boice Nominated President of NCRP
. February Journal
. February ORS
. Schauer Given the Butterfly Award from Image Gently
. Kase President's Report to IRPA
. IRPA13 Accepting Posters
Upcoming Events
. HPS Midyear - Issues in Waste Management
5-8 February 2012
Dallas, Texas
. NRC Regulatory Information Conference
NRC Regulatory Information Conference
13-15 March 2012
Rockville, Maryland
. NCRP Annual Meeting
12-13 March 2012
Washington, DC
. James E. Turner Memorial Symposium
Call for Abstracts
18-19 April 2012
Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Pollard Auditorium, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
. IRPA13
13-18 May 2012
Glasgow, Scotland
. Canadian Radiation Protection Association (CRPA) Annual Meeting
27-30 May 2012
Halifax, Nova Scotia
. ACS Undergrad Summer Schools
10 June- 20 July 2012
. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Meeting Webcasts
February 2012
Bethesda, Maryland
09 February 2012

Answer to Question #3752 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Environmental and Background Radiation — Air

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q

During the spring months after significant rainfalls I have seen elevated readings in my effluent sampling media (KI charcoal). We work primarily with 125I which is all I would expect to see in the samples. The samples are downstream of charcoal filter banks. I have done a short half-life study on the sample and it is decaying at a faster rate than the rate of 125I (I use a 59.6 day half-life). I am measuring the samples on a well NaI crystal single channel analyzer. Have you seen any naturally occurring radon daughters that might attribute to this anomaly? This happens routinely every spring and I am supposing that the radon is forced out of the ground by the rainfall and some of the material is somehow bypassing the filtration and being collected on the media.

A

Analyze the suspect effluent sampling media on a low-background, high-resolution gamma-ray spectrometer to identify the radionuclide(s). If you do not have access to such a spectrometer, measure the half-life (lives) quantitatively and compare it (them) with likely suspects, including 222Rn. It would seem likely that 222Rn is the problem, except that you are sampling air that has already passed though a charcoal filter bank, which would presumable remove most of the radon.

Tom Gesell, PhD

 

Answer posted on 18 May 2004. The information and material posted on this website is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Website. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
image
image
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings