|
||||||||||||||
Answer to Question #377 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"Category: Instrumentation and Measurements — Personnel Monitoring (PM) The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field: Q
What are the disadvantages of using x-ray film badges for personal monitoring of employees using x-ray generating equipment for QA inspection? Our local Dept. of Health requires us to conduct such monitoring but we have not detected any reading for the past three years.
A
There are several factors that need to be assessed when determining the most appropriate dosimeter for a specific application:
What is the radiation environment that is to be monitored?
The answers to the above questions will determine what type of dosimeter needs to be worn, i.e., TLD or film dosimeter, and, the length of monitoring period. The most prevalent Minimal Reportable Dose (MRD) for both the TLD and film dosimeter is 10 mrem over the entire monitoring period. If the individual is in a low exposure area, the facility might consider a longer monitoring period. Film can generally be worn up to 3 months, if appropriate QA is provided by the processing facility, and, proper environmental controls are implemented, and, the Control dosimeter is returned with the personnel dosimeters. The only disadvantage I can state may be the potential false positives that may occur when the film is exposed at the MRD level, at approximately 10 mrem. If the dose determination is 9.5 mrem, there is no dose reported. But at 9.6 the dose reported would be 10 mrem. The statistics are poor at this low dose. A TLD on the other hand can be worn for up to 6 months when the dose is required to be measured by regulatory entities. For those who wish to be monitored, but are not required to be monitored by regulatory entities, the TLD can be worn for up to 12 months, without any appreciable dose degradation, as long as appropriate fade correction is implemented by the processing facility. There are significant advantages in wearing a film dosimeter in an x-ray environment: Film is an excellent x-ray spectra differentiator. With 4 or 5 filtered areas for dose assessment, the appropriate x-ray energy can be determined quite accurately. Film can be analyzed to determine whether or not the exposure was received during an occupational exposure, or, whether or not the film was irradiated in a stationary mode, where the person was not occupationally exposed. The film can be maintained indefinitely, and can be reassessed, or be used during litigation. A TLD, once read, can not be reprocessed. The only factor that can be reviewed is the TLD glow curve, which determines whether or not the TLD was damaged, or, that the dose reported is an accurate dose assessment. In conclusion, there are few disadvantages in using a film dosimeter in an x-ray environment. The reality is, it is probably the best dosimeter to be worn in an x-ray environment. Sander C. Perle
Answer posted on 11 August 2000. The information and material posted on this website is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Website. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
|
||||||||||||||
| This page last updated 27 August 2011. Ask Question | Search ATE | Site Map | Privacy Statement | Disclaimer | Webmaster | ||||||||||||||