HPS masthead
What's New?
. Fukushima Decontamination Report
. CRCPD & CDC Grants for Volunteer Corps
. America's Nuclear Future
. February Newsletter
. Boice Nominated President of NCRP
. February Journal
. February ORS
. Schauer Given the Butterfly Award from Image Gently
. Kase President's Report to IRPA
. IRPA13 Accepting Posters
Upcoming Events
. HPS Midyear - Issues in Waste Management
5-8 February 2012
Dallas, Texas
. NRC Regulatory Information Conference
NRC Regulatory Information Conference
13-15 March 2012
Rockville, Maryland
. NCRP Annual Meeting
12-13 March 2012
Washington, DC
. James E. Turner Memorial Symposium
Call for Abstracts
18-19 April 2012
Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Pollard Auditorium, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
. IRPA13
13-18 May 2012
Glasgow, Scotland
. Canadian Radiation Protection Association (CRPA) Annual Meeting
27-30 May 2012
Halifax, Nova Scotia
. ACS Undergrad Summer Schools
10 June- 20 July 2012
. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Meeting Webcasts
February 2012
Bethesda, Maryland
09 February 2012

Answer to Question #382 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Doses and Dose Calculations — External dose calculations

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q
Hello. I have a technical question that I hope someone here can help me with. I'm having a hard time trying to understand how to calculate dose equivalent rates (for gamma radiation), in mSv/h, for example. Specifically: 1. Do "specific gamma ray dose constants" obey the inverse-square law? I have a standard table for values derived/calculated (at a distance of 1 m) for nuclides such as 11C, 125I and so forth. At a distance of 2 m, for example, are the values of these gamma constants, 1/4 of their original values (i.e. at a distance of 1 m)? 2. What role does surface area (upon which the gamma rays are incident) play in the dose equivalent rate? Is there any relationship between (incident surface area and final dose equivalent *rate*)? Thank you!
A
The gamma ray constants do obey the inverse-square law when used for points sources. Corrections will need to be made for line or area sources. With regard to your second question, I'm assuming the question refers to small or localized areas of the body being subjected to gamma radiation. Typical whole body dose calculations are based on the fact that the entire body is exposed to the same gamma fluence. If a small area of the body is exposed, such as in a directional source, then a "weighting factor" can be used to determine the committed effective dose equivalent. The weighting factor will take into account the area of the body and what internal organs are exposed. Jerry Hensley Battelle Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Answer posted on 11 August 2000. The information and material posted on this website is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Website. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
image
image
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings