HPS masthead
What's New?
. Fukushima Decontamination Report
. CRCPD & CDC Grants for Volunteer Corps
. America's Nuclear Future
. February Newsletter
. Boice Nominated President of NCRP
. February Journal
. February ORS
. Schauer Given the Butterfly Award from Image Gently
. Kase President's Report to IRPA
. IRPA13 Accepting Posters
Upcoming Events
. HPS Midyear - Issues in Waste Management
5-8 February 2012
Dallas, Texas
. NRC Regulatory Information Conference
NRC Regulatory Information Conference
13-15 March 2012
Rockville, Maryland
. NCRP Annual Meeting
12-13 March 2012
Washington, DC
. James E. Turner Memorial Symposium
Call for Abstracts
18-19 April 2012
Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Pollard Auditorium, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
. IRPA13
13-18 May 2012
Glasgow, Scotland
. Canadian Radiation Protection Association (CRPA) Annual Meeting
27-30 May 2012
Halifax, Nova Scotia
. ACS Undergrad Summer Schools
10 June- 20 July 2012
. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Meeting Webcasts
February 2012
Bethesda, Maryland
08 February 2012

Answer to Question #4041 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Medical and Dental Equipment/Shielding — Equipment

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q

Can radiation dose be reduced by increasing focus to film distance and increasing the mAs to give adequate density for a diagnostic x ray?

A

No. Initially, increasing the focus to film distance will decrease patient dose, but there will not be sufficient x rays reaching the image receptor to give an adequate image. As you suggested, the mAs would have to be increased to compensate for the greater distance (Curry et al. 1984). Due to the inverse square law, the net result would be to increase the mAs to get the same number of x rays to strike the image receptor to get the same image. Since the number of x rays at the receptor and, essentially, the patient, doesn’t change, the dose to the patient will be the same.

Ken "Duke" Lovins, CHP

Reference
Curry TS III, Dowdry JE, Murry RC Jr. Christensen’s introduction to the physics of diagnostic radiology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lea and Febiger; 1984: 159.

Answer posted on 11 November 2004. The information and material posted on this website is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Website. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
image
image
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings