HPS masthead
search
What's New?
. April Newsletter
. April Journal
Upcoming Events
. 2010 Summer Professional Development School
Internal Dosimetry
23 - 26 June 2010
Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho
. International Conference on Radiation Protection in Medicine
1-3 September 2010
Varna, Bulgaria
. 2010 Meeting of the Air Monitoring Users Group
4-7 May 2010
Las Vegas, NV
19 March 2010

Answer to Question #4043 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Medical and Dental Patient Issues — Diagnostic X Ray and CT

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q

An inexperienced x-ray technician in a disability screening facility took between 15 and 30 x rays of me, trying to adjust the settings on a machine too small for a person of my size. I consulted with the county radiation control unit and they investigated and informed me that the state physicist concluded I received a minimum of 5,025 mR. Neither they nor my doctor will discuss what, if anything, this means except to say "that's a lot of radiation." They act "funny" when I bring it up and change the subject quickly. My doctor did decide to check my blood and said "as of right now, your blood is close to normal."

How much radiation is 5,025-10,050 mR and what did it do to me? I can't get a straight answer from anyone. I would appreciate any explanation/approximation you can offer. I just need some general information. Can you help me?

A

Interesting question, thanks for asking. Let me start with a couple of things, then give some other typical radiation doses for comparison, and finish with possible risks.

The unit of radiation exposure you provided in your question is given in terms of mR or milliRoentgen. This is a unit typically used for the entrance skin exposure—not the actual amount received by the organs in the x-ray field or the amount we use to determine risk from radiation exposure. The dose received by the organs is typically less than the exposure to the skin where the x rays enter (so the risk is less; effective dose is usually reported in a radiation unit called millirem or mrem). I also point this out because, for instance, radiation exposure of your arm is going to have little if any risk associated with it; so exposure to your arm cannot really be added to an exposure of your abdomen. In any event, I have included a table listing various skin exposures and effective doses for some common diagnostic x-ray exams so you can see this for yourself (Wall 1997).

Single Radiographs        

Skin Exposure, mR

Effective Dose, mrem

Chest (PA)           

15

2

Chest (lateral)

40

4

Thoracic spine (AP)

200

40

Thoracic spine (lateral)

500

  30  

Lumbar spine (AP)

250

70

Lumbar spine (lateral)

600

30

Abdomen (AP)

250

70 

Pelvis (AP)

250

70

CT chest

3,000-4,000

800

CT pelvis

3,000-5,000

1,000

CT abdomen

3,000-5,000

1,000

Another comparison that might be useful is the regulatory occupational dose limit for employees who take the x rays or who are exposed to radiation for other reasons because of their job. The regulatory occupational limit is 5,000 mrem per year.

As for the risk of radiation doses, the risk for lifetime fatal cancer due to radiation exposure is estimated at 5 per million per 1,000 mrem (NCRP 1993). This means if one million people were exposed to 1,000 mrem of radiation over their lifetime, five of those million would develop a fatal cancer. The general lifetime fatal cancer risk is about 200,000 per million (about one in five). That means, without additional radiation exposure, we each have a one in five risk of getting cancer. Adding the risk from 10,000 mrem of radiation exposure to the general risk, the total calculated fatal cancer risk would go from 200,000 per million to about 200,050 per million.

This is only a calculation and it is based on statistics obtained from people receiving very high amounts of radiation exposure. According to Dr. Eric Hall, a radiobiologist and professor of radiation oncology and radiology at Columbia University, 5,000 mrem/y is conservatively the lowest dose rate where there is any evidence of cancer risk (Hall 1984).

I hope this information is useful for you to put the radiation level you received into perspective.

Kelly Classic
Certified Medical Health Physicist

References
Wall BF, Hart D. Revised radiation doses for typical x-ray examinations. The British Journal of Radiology 70:437-439; 1997. (5,000 patient dose measurements from 375 hospitals)

Hall, EJ. Radiobiology for the radiologist. Philadelphia, PA: J.B. Lippincott Company; 1984.

National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Limitation of exposure to ionizing radiation. Bethesda, MD: NCRP; NCRP Report 116; 1993.

 

Answer posted on 21 October 2004. The information and material posted on this Web site is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Web site. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings