HPS masthead
search
What's New?
. April Journal
PDF Radiological and Nuclear Preparedness - CDC Public Health Grand Rounds Session
Upcoming Events
. 2010 Summer Professional Development School
Internal Dosimetry
23 - 26 June 2010
Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho
16 March 2010

Answer to Question #4056 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Nuclear Power — Nuclear Accidents

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q

I am doing a research project about three major nuclear accidents: Tokaimura, Chernobyl, and Three Mile Island. How could these accidents have been avoided ? Do these incidents prove that nuclear power plants should be phased out? Why or why not?

A

There is a comprehensive summary of all three of these events on a previous Ask the Experts question. This link will give you an excellent summary of the events. Regarding your last two questions, those are philosophical in nature. Everything in life involves risk. All risks have benefits associated with them. At any given time we all decide whether the benefit of a given activity is worth the risk of that given activity. For instance, flying in an airplane provides a real benefit allowing us to get to places more quickly, yet planes do crash and people are killed. Generating electricity provides a real benefit to billions of people, yet ALL sources of power generation can and have caused injury and/or death to people. Does that mean we should phase out nuclear power as a method of power generation? In my opinion, no, because it is by far the cleanest source of large-scale power generation currently available. Is it without risks? No, but those risks can and have been managed for the past 40 to 50 years.

Linda Sewell, CHP

Answer posted on 27 October 2004. The information and material posted on this Web site is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Web site. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings