HPS masthead
search
What's New?
. December Journal
. December Newsletter
. Online Registration for HPS 2010 Midyear Meeting Now Available
. NRC Academic Program Nuclear Education Grants, FY2010, Now Accepting Applications
. EPA's STAR Graduate and GRO Undergraduate Fellowship Funding Now Accepting Applications
Upcoming Events
. 2010 HPS Midyear Topical Meeting
Radiation Risk Communication to the Public
24-27 January 2010
Albuquerque, NM
. 2010 HPS Professional Development School
Radiation Risk Communication: Issues and Solutions
27-29 January 2010
Albuquerque, NM
21 November 2009

Answer to Question #4235 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Medical and Dental Equipment/Shielding — Lead Aprons

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q

If a 60Co teletherapy unit gets stuck in the "expose" position, do I wear a lead apron into the room and how much dose will I receive?

A

Lead aprons are generally designed for protection from diagnostic x rays, which have a much lower energy than 60Co teletherapy. The typical lead apron thickness is 0.5 mm, which is approximately two half-value layers for diagnostic x ray (that is, will reduce exposure to below one-fourth of the incident radiation). The half-value layer in lead for 60Co is 12 mm. The use of a standard lead apron will do very little to reduce exposure to 60Co. In addition, if a source is stuck in the "expose" position, time is of the essence when removing the patient from the beam.  The additional time for a staff member to put on a lead apron would result in a significantly higher radiation dose to the patient who is still in the radiation beam.

Typical patient exposure in the radiation beam of a  60Co teletherapy unit is ~80-160 R/min and the maximum amount of scatter radiation at one meter from the patient is 0.6% of the incident radiation beam (~hundreds of mR/min).

The United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission maintains a Nuclear Events Database that includes incidents for all devices that utilize radioactive sources.

References

  • Introduction to Health Physics, Second Edition, Cember H., p. 309.
  • Personal conversation with John Freshcorn, ABR certified Therapy Medical Physicist
  • Structural Shielding Design and Evaluation for Medical Use of X-Rays and Gamma Rays of Energies up to 10 MeV, National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements Report No. 49, p. 59.


Ken "Duke" Lovins, CHP

Answer posted on 3 February 2005. The information and material posted on this Web site is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Web site. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings