HPS masthead
What's New?
. Fukushima Decontamination Report
. CRCPD & CDC Grants for Volunteer Corps
. America's Nuclear Future
. February Newsletter
. Boice Nominated President of NCRP
. February Journal
. February ORS
. Schauer Given the Butterfly Award from Image Gently
. Kase President's Report to IRPA
. IRPA13 Accepting Posters
Upcoming Events
. HPS Midyear - Issues in Waste Management
5-8 February 2012
Dallas, Texas
. NRC Regulatory Information Conference
NRC Regulatory Information Conference
13-15 March 2012
Rockville, Maryland
. NCRP Annual Meeting
12-13 March 2012
Washington, DC
. James E. Turner Memorial Symposium
Call for Abstracts
18-19 April 2012
Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Pollard Auditorium, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
. IRPA13
13-18 May 2012
Glasgow, Scotland
. Canadian Radiation Protection Association (CRPA) Annual Meeting
27-30 May 2012
Halifax, Nova Scotia
. ACS Undergrad Summer Schools
10 June- 20 July 2012
. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Meeting Webcasts
February 2012
Bethesda, Maryland
09 February 2012

Answer to Question #4405 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Doses and Dose Calculations — Basic dose information, dose quantities, units

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q

Line vs Point Source Calculations At what point do I use a point source calculation,inverse square law vs inverse law, as I back away from a line source. I have always used L/2 as this point but some of my study material is using L (being the length of the line source) for 137Cs. And does it make a difference what isotope is the source?

A
The general rules of thumb to answer the question: "when may an extended source be treated as a point source" are as follows: Any source for which the source extent is small compared to the distance to the detector can be treated as a point source:

1. When the distance is three times the largest source dimension this approximation only introduces a few percent error.
2. When the distance between the point of interest and a line source is great, such that the angle between the point of interest and the top and bottom of the source is less than 20 degrees, then the line source can be treated as a point source with an error of only a few percent.

The radionuclide being modeled does not impact the appropriateness of this type of assumption. If the reader is interested in learning more about the point kernel technique he/she is referred to the Engineering Compendium on Radiation Shielding edited by R.G. Jaeger et al., Springer-Verlag: New York; 1968, ISBN (Library of Congress Catalog number) 68-19816. (It is suggested that the reader consider Volume One of the three-volume set for such basic types of questions).

Another useful reference could be the Reactor Shielding Design Manual by Theodore Rockwell, D. Van Nostrand Company Inc., New York; 1956.

Richard R. Brey, PhD, CHP
Answer posted on 12 April 2005. The information and material posted on this website is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Website. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
image
image
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings