HPS masthead
What's New?
. Fukushima Decontamination Report
. CRCPD & CDC Grants for Volunteer Corps
. America's Nuclear Future
. February Newsletter
. Boice Nominated President of NCRP
. February Journal
. February ORS
. Schauer Given the Butterfly Award from Image Gently
. Kase President's Report to IRPA
. IRPA13 Accepting Posters
Upcoming Events
. HPS Midyear - Issues in Waste Management
5-8 February 2012
Dallas, Texas
. NRC Regulatory Information Conference
NRC Regulatory Information Conference
13-15 March 2012
Rockville, Maryland
. NCRP Annual Meeting
12-13 March 2012
Washington, DC
. James E. Turner Memorial Symposium
Call for Abstracts
18-19 April 2012
Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Pollard Auditorium, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
. IRPA13
13-18 May 2012
Glasgow, Scotland
. Canadian Radiation Protection Association (CRPA) Annual Meeting
27-30 May 2012
Halifax, Nova Scotia
. ACS Undergrad Summer Schools
10 June- 20 July 2012
. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Meeting Webcasts
February 2012
Bethesda, Maryland
09 February 2012

Answer to Question #4505 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Medical and Dental Equipment/Shielding — Shielding

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q

I had a paranasal sinus CT scan today. I had a scan lying on my tummy with a chin support and then another one lying on my back. Before the procedure, I asked the technician if I would be wearing a lead apron/shield during the procedure. The technician said there's no need for that, since there is a new theory/study showing that no shielding allows scatter to exit the body. Is this true and safe?

A

No, this is not true. The shielding in question would be shielding placed over the reproductive organs to minimize exposure from the direct x-ray beam or scattered radiation from an x-ray beam that is close to the reproductive organs, i.e., within a few inches. Since your study was of the sinuses, the direct x-ray beam was a considerable distance from the reproductive organs. One study (Dietrich et al. 2005) has shown that the scattered radiation dose to tissue that is eight inches out of the direct CT beam is only about 1% of the exposure received by tissue in the beam. In your case of a sinus study, the reproductive organs were much farther than eight inches from the direct beam. The scattered radiation to the reproductive organs was insignificant and not requiring of any shielding.

Kenneth L. Miller, CHP, CMHP

Reference
Dietrich M, Miller K, King S. Determination of potential uterine (conceptus) doses from axial and helical CT. Operational Radiation Safety (Supplement to Health Phys) 88(2):S10-S13; 2005.

Answer posted on 18 May 2005. The information and material posted on this website is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Website. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
image
image
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings