HPS masthead
search
What's New?
National Radiation Protection Professionals Week, 2-8 November 2008
PDF HPS Issues Position on Ensuring a Domestic Supply of Medical Radioisotopes
PDF HPS Comments on Radioactive CsCl Source Security and Replacement
October Newsletter
October Journal
Upcoming Events
IRPA 12
19-24 October 2008
HPS Midyear Meeting
Recent Advances in Planning and Response to Radiation Emergencies
31 January - 3 February 2009

San Antonio, Texas
54th Annual Meeting of the Health Physics Society
12-16 July 2009
Minneapolis, Minnesota
11 October 2008

Answer to Question #4505 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Medical and Dental Equipment/Shielding — Shielding

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q

I had a paranasal sinus CT scan today. I had a scan lying on my tummy with a chin support and then another one lying on my back. Before the procedure, I asked the technician if I would be wearing a lead apron/shield during the procedure. The technician said there's no need for that, since there is a new theory/study showing that no shielding allows scatter to exit the body. Is this true and safe?

A

No, this is not true. The shielding in question would be shielding placed over the reproductive organs to minimize exposure from the direct x-ray beam or scattered radiation from an x-ray beam that is close to the reproductive organs, i.e., within a few inches. Since your study was of the sinuses, the direct x-ray beam was a considerable distance from the reproductive organs. One study (Dietrich et al. 2005) has shown that the scattered radiation dose to tissue that is eight inches out of the direct CT beam is only about 1% of the exposure received by tissue in the beam. In your case of a sinus study, the reproductive organs were much farther than eight inches from the direct beam. The scattered radiation to the reproductive organs was insignificant and not requiring of any shielding.

Kenneth L. Miller, CHP, CMHP

Reference
Dietrich M, Miller K, King S. Determination of potential uterine (conceptus) doses from axial and helical CT. Operational Radiation Safety (Supplement to Health Phys) 88(2):S10-S13; 2005.

Answer posted on 18 May 2005. The information and material posted on this Web site is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Web site. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings