|
||||||||||||||||||
Answer to Question #4805 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"Category: Medical and Dental Patient Issues — Diagnostic X Ray and CT The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field: Q
I have no medical insurance and travel to Korea a lot so, while
there, I sometimes get medical things looked after. Last month I
thought I should have a chest x ray done. I have played music forever
in smoky bars and my dad died of lung cancer and my mother survived
breast cancer. The Korean clinic I went to was small and not modern-looking at all. The x-ray machine looked very old to me. I faced
against a metal thing and the picture was shot at my back. The x ray
showed my spine, lungs, chest—everything normal. The doctor said
the radiation would be small and showed me his license to operate it
and the test from the city that approves the use of the machine every
two years it is tested. After this I have had bad anxiety because of
how crude the x-ray machine and room looked. My fear is maybe the
machine was old and gave me a very high dose of radiation. There was no
lead covering for any other part of my body either. Is there any word
of comfort you can say about my situation?
A
Without having seen the x-ray unit or knowing the radiation safety
regulations regarding testing of equipment and licensing of operators
in Korea, I cannot determine the exact amount of radiation dose
received during your chest x ray. Typically, of all of the diagnostic
x-ray procedures that are performed, patient dose is usually very low
for chest x rays. If the equipment was not properly maintained, that
radiation dose may be slightly higher; however, the overall risk would
not be much different. If you are concerned about lung cancer, being
exposed to secondhand smoke would provide a much higher risk than a
routine chest x ray. Also, if the x-ray beam was adjusted to the size
of the film, then there is little need for any additional patient
shielding because the collimators in the x-ray unit are able to block
out almost all of the radiation outside the area of interest.
Answer posted on 17 November 2005. The information and material posted on this website is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Website. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| This page last updated 27 August 2011. Ask Question | Search ATE | Site Map | Privacy Statement | Disclaimer | Webmaster | ||||||||||||||||||