HPS masthead
search
What's New?
. April Newsletter
. April Journal
Upcoming Events
. 2010 Summer Professional Development School
Internal Dosimetry
23 - 26 June 2010
Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho
. International Conference on Radiation Protection in Medicine
1-3 September 2010
Varna, Bulgaria
. 2010 Meeting of the Air Monitoring Users Group
4-7 May 2010
Las Vegas, NV
19 March 2010

Answer to Question #484 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Pregnancy and Radiation — Radioactivity in food and water

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q
Please let me know if high levels of radium in drinking water can harm an unborn fetus and/or nursing a newborn baby. I live in Plainfield, Illinois, where the levels are too high to be safe to drink . . . so says the back of our water bill each month! Please advise.
A
Thank you for providing additional information pertaining to the concentration of radium in your drinking water. The reported concentration of 6.4 picocuries per liter is most likely for the radionuclide radium-226 (226Ra). This is a naturally occurring radioactive material with a very long half-life (1,600 years) that is produced as natural uranium decays in soil and rock. Rock and soil in some locations have greater amounts of uranium (and therefore 226Ra) than rock and soil in other locations. Drinking water supplies from rock formations with higher amounts of radium will most likely have higher concentrations of 226Ra than other water sources. The reported concentration of 6.4 picocuries per liter for 226Ra in your water is less than the concentrations found in many other drinking water supplies in the United States. For example, there are several drinking water supplies in the Milwaukee, Wisconsin, area (and in other parts of the United States) that have 226Ra concentrations much higher than 6.4 picocuries per liter. Of course, the preceding information doesn't answer your question about potential health effects from the reported radium concentration in your water. Please let me continue with my answer. There is 226Ra in almost everything we eat or drink. The amounts vary from place to place and for different items that we eat and for the air that we breathe. Furthermore, 226Ra is only one source of the natural background radiation dose we receive each day. The radiation dose that the average U.S. resident receives each day from all background radiation sources combined has been determined by reputable organizations of scientists to be approximately 1 millirem. (The millirem is a unit of radiation dose just as the inch is a unit of length and a fluid ounce is a unit of volume.) A person living in Denver, Colorado, receives up to twice this average dose and a resident of the Gulf Coast region receives almost half of this average dose. These natural background doses are safe doses that have never been shown to produce any adverse health effects. In fact, radiation doses much higher than the average natural background radiation doses are also safe (that is, no adverse health effects have ever been shown to be produced by those doses). It is only those radiation doses that are many times the average natural background doses that may produce adverse health effects. I have calculated the radiation dose that you or your children could receive from drinking 64 fluid ounces (1.89 liters) of water each day having 6.4 picocuries of 226Ra per liter of water. (The calculation method I used is called "internal dosimetry" and is accepted in the United States and around the world as the correct way to perform such dose calculations.) The calculated daily radiation dose that you or your children would receive from drinking this water is a small fraction (a few percent or less) of the average daily natural background dose that you already receive. These doses are safe doses that will not produce any adverse health effects. Please be assured that I would not be concerned about drinking water containing 226Ra at 6.4 picocuries per liter nor would I have any concern for my family to drink such water. I hope that this information is useful. Genevieve S. Roessler, Ph.D.
Answer posted on 11 December 2000. The information and material posted on this Web site is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Web site. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings