HPS masthead
What's New?
. Fukushima Decontamination Report
. CRCPD & CDC Grants for Volunteer Corps
. America's Nuclear Future
. February Newsletter
. Boice Nominated President of NCRP
. February Journal
. February ORS
. Schauer Given the Butterfly Award from Image Gently
. Kase President's Report to IRPA
. IRPA13 Accepting Posters
Upcoming Events
. HPS Midyear - Issues in Waste Management
5-8 February 2012
Dallas, Texas
. NRC Regulatory Information Conference
NRC Regulatory Information Conference
13-15 March 2012
Rockville, Maryland
. NCRP Annual Meeting
12-13 March 2012
Washington, DC
. James E. Turner Memorial Symposium
Call for Abstracts
18-19 April 2012
Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Pollard Auditorium, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
. IRPA13
13-18 May 2012
Glasgow, Scotland
. Canadian Radiation Protection Association (CRPA) Annual Meeting
27-30 May 2012
Halifax, Nova Scotia
. ACS Undergrad Summer Schools
10 June- 20 July 2012
. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Meeting Webcasts
February 2012
Bethesda, Maryland
08 February 2012

Answer to Question #4883 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Nuclear Medicine Patient Issues — Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q
Due to an accident, I had to undergo partial hip replacement surgery five months ago and have had numerous x rays of my hip, chest, and knees. Just previous to this surgery, I took my yearly mammogram and chest x ray. My doctor would like me to take a routine stress test. I had asked the cardiologist about the radiation exposure; he said it is minimal. I would like to know the amount of radiation content for the nuclear dye injection that's given. Am I exposing myself to too much radiation that could be harmful and cumulative in the future? Should I wait a few months to lessen the exposure? I am a healthy 75-year-old female.
A
If your doctor is interested in a nuclear medicine stress test, I would not delay it at all due to concerns about radiation doses. The routine mammogram and chest x ray involve relatively low radiation doses. The other exams done in relation to your accident probably involved higher doses, but levels that we would still characterize as "low" in the overall scheme of things.

Not knowing exactly which test will be administered, and with how much activity, I cannot give any kind of precise estimate of the dose. One source shows that for a commonly used test (99mTc Sestamibi) the effective dose might be about 5.8 mSv (580 mrem), which is comparable to our typical radiation exposures from background radiation over two years or so. It sounds like you are doing a great job with your personal medical care and are staying informed about the procedures involved; this is highly desirable and you are to be commended.

The radiation doses from diagnostic medical procedures give you direct benefits and involve very small, if any, risks from side effects of the radiation. If you and your physician agree that the test will yield some useful information, then concerns about the small radiation doses involved should not preclude any needed test.

Michael G. Stabin, PhD, CHP
Answer posted on 14 October 2005. The information and material posted on this website is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Website. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
image
image
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings