HPS masthead
search
What's New?
National Radiation Protection Professionals Week, 2-8 November 2008
PDF HPS Issues Position on Ensuring a Domestic Supply of Medical Radioisotopes
PDF HPS Comments on Radioactive CsCl Source Security and Replacement
October Newsletter
October Journal
Upcoming Events
IRPA 12
19-24 October 2008
HPS Midyear Meeting
Recent Advances in Planning and Response to Radiation Emergencies
31 January - 3 February 2009

San Antonio, Texas
54th Annual Meeting of the Health Physics Society
12-16 July 2009
Minneapolis, Minnesota
10 October 2008

Answer to Question #4904 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Instrumentation and Measurements — Instrument Calibration (IC)

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q

Why is the relative efficiency of a high-purity germanium detector calculated with respect to 3" x 3" NaI(Tl) detectors only and why not with the other size NaI(Tl) detectors?

A

Perhaps the major reason that germanium detector efficiencies are specified relative to a 3" x 3" NaI (sodium iodide) detector is simply historical. For many years preceding the introduction of germanium detectors, the "standard" detector used in the laboratory for gamma spectral analysis was the 3" x 3" NaI scintillation detector. When the germanium detectors became available, people interested in gamma spectrometry were naturally interested in how the efficiencies of these new semiconductor detectors compared to the NaI detectors that were so familiar to them. Thus arose the convention of comparing efficiencies of the new detectors to the earlier ones. Efficiencies for the germanium detectors are usually specified as a percentage of the 3" x 3" NaI detector photopeak efficiency at a specified energy, most often the higher photon energy of cobalt-60 energy (1.33 MeV).

A second reason for presenting germanium efficiencies relative to NaI is that germanium detectors are available in different geometries, such as planar detectors, coaxial detectors, and others, all of which have different efficiencies even when their volumes are the same. Using the efficiencies relative to NaI may reduce some uncertainties or confusion surrounding such differences. I hope this answers your question.
 
George Chabot, PhD, CHP
 

Answer posted on 27 October 2005. The information and material posted on this Web site is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Web site. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings