|
||||||||||||||||
Answer to Question #5067 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"Category: Medical and Dental Patient Issues — Diagnostic X Ray and CT The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field: Q
When my daughter was three months old she had a hyphema
(bleeding in the eye). The emergency room doctor ordered a CT
(computerized tomography) of her brain to rule out bleeding in her
brain. Later an ophthalmologist said this was unnecessary. She moved
during the procedure and it was done twice because the first results
were blurry. I have been seeing information on risk of CT in children
and wonder what you can tell me.
A
The paper Computed Tomography and Radiation Risks: What Pediatric Health Care Providers Should Know
provides a nice overview of pediatric CT, the risks, and methods for
minimizing patient radiation exposure. Additionally, I recommend
reading the Ask the Experts summary Risk/Benefit
of Medical Radiation Exposures for a perspective of radiation risks as
they pertain to medical practice.
It is difficult to provide a risk assessment in your particular case because the radiation dose and related risk is very dependent on the machine settings used, e.g., tube current, tube kV, and exposure time. However, there are some generalized estimates of pediatric radiation risk in the literature. In particular, Brenner estimates an increased lifetime cancer mortality risk of 0.04% (1 in 2,500) for a head CT of a young female patient (Brenner 2002). This would be in addition to the normal lifetime cancer mortality risk of approximately 20% (1 in 5). Brenner states, "The individual risks are small, and so the benefit/risk ratio for any individual child would generally be very big." Brenner's work did highlight the need to develop pediatric-specific imaging protocols, thereby reducing the amount of radiation used to generate clinically useful CT images. Glenn Sturchio Certified Health Physicist Reference Brenner DJ. Estimating cancer risks from pediatric CT: Going from the qualitative to the quantitative. Pediatric Radiology 32(4):228-231; 2002.
Answer posted on 13 February 2006. The information and material posted on this Web site is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Web site. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
|
||||||||||||||||
| This page last updated 18 December 2009. Ask Question | Search ATE | Site Map | Privacy Statement | Disclaimer | Security Notice | Webmaster | ||||||||||||||||