HPS masthead
search
What's New?
National Radiation Protection Professionals Week, 2-8 November 2008
PDF HPS Issues Position on Ensuring a Domestic Supply of Medical Radioisotopes
PDF HPS Comments on Radioactive CsCl Source Security and Replacement
October Newsletter
October Journal
Upcoming Events
IRPA 12
19-24 October 2008
HPS Midyear Meeting
Recent Advances in Planning and Response to Radiation Emergencies
31 January - 3 February 2009

San Antonio, Texas
54th Annual Meeting of the Health Physics Society
12-16 July 2009
Minneapolis, Minnesota
10 October 2008

Answer to Question #509 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Pregnancy and Radiation — Exposures not directly to embryo/fetus

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q
My sister is 13 weeks pregnant and went into the emergency room (ER) with chest pains. The ER Doctor did a chest x ray as well as a test measuring her oxygen carbon level. This test resulted in the number 34. They felt a VQ scan was necessary to rule out a lung blood clot. My question is, what is the risk to the fetus for such a procedure? She is very scared as you can imagine and we are unclear of the actual risk to her unborn child.
A
Editor's note: It was recommended that this person try to find out the estimate of the dose to the fetus during the procedures and then to place a phone call to our radiation-in-pregnancy expert. We asked that she then summarize his advice so that we could post it to provide information for others in a similiar situation. Following is her response. Gen Roessler, Editor HPS Web Site "Thank you so much for referring me to [your radiation-in-pregnancy expert]. He is truly an amazing man and dedicated to his patients. He reassured me immensely. He gave me very important information, but for fear of misquoting, I will generalize what I heard. He said at these dosages there is no measurable risk. The embryo is completely developed, the heart has four chambers, the brain is closed at four weeks, the eye is closed. There is no anatomical defect. At very high doses is when defects occur, and this was not even close. I'm sure I have simpified it and have not been as accurate as he, so I hope his information is of use to you. My husband is an ophthalmologist attending a [major medical center]. He is a dedicated caring doctor, so it was very refreshing speaking to your expert and getting the opportunity to talk to such a wonderful person and doctor. As I'm sure you can tell I really enjoyed speaking with him. He will never know how much his wisdom helps others. Thank you for your referral."
Answer posted on 21 November 2000. The information and material posted on this Web site is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Web site. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings