HPS masthead
What's New?
. Fukushima Decontamination Report
. CRCPD & CDC Grants for Volunteer Corps
. America's Nuclear Future
. February Newsletter
. Boice Nominated President of NCRP
. February Journal
. February ORS
. Schauer Given the Butterfly Award from Image Gently
. Kase President's Report to IRPA
. IRPA13 Accepting Posters
Upcoming Events
. HPS Midyear - Issues in Waste Management
5-8 February 2012
Dallas, Texas
. NRC Regulatory Information Conference
NRC Regulatory Information Conference
13-15 March 2012
Rockville, Maryland
. NCRP Annual Meeting
12-13 March 2012
Washington, DC
. James E. Turner Memorial Symposium
Call for Abstracts
18-19 April 2012
Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Pollard Auditorium, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
. IRPA13
13-18 May 2012
Glasgow, Scotland
. Canadian Radiation Protection Association (CRPA) Annual Meeting
27-30 May 2012
Halifax, Nova Scotia
. ACS Undergrad Summer Schools
10 June- 20 July 2012
. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Meeting Webcasts
February 2012
Bethesda, Maryland
09 February 2012

Answer to Question #5108 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Radiation Safety Careers — What is a Health Physicist?

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q

Can you contrast nuclear engineers and health physicists? In particular, which has a higher enrollment rate at bachelor, MS, and PhD levels? Which area can expect more growth in the next 10 years? Are there appreciable salary differences?

A
Health Physics is the profession dedicated to the protection of humans and their environment from the harmful effects of ionizing radiation while providing for its beneficial uses.

Nuclear Engineering is concerned with the design and construction of nuclear facilities.

There are some tasks nuclear engineers are responsible for in which health physicists probably would never be involved to any appreciable extent and visa versa. And to contrast that, there are some tasks in which these professions are both intimately involved.

Both professions require multidisciplined individuals to understand and solve, in many cases, unique problems. They are clearly entwined professions. Health physicists and nuclear engineers collaborate daily in some facilities. Professionals in other facilities may have little interaction. They are part of a team interested in the positive and safe application of nuclear and radiation technology for the betterment of human kind.

Nuclear engineering is a slightly larger profession, so one can anticipate in total more participants at every level in nuclear engineering than health physics. Both, in the scheme of things, are relatively small occupations with respect to the total number of participants.

Growth potential in both professions can be categorized as very good. If the application of nuclear power production is again invested in by the United States then the growth potential in both occupations will be considered exceptional. If nothing new happens we know with great certainty in health physics that the demand for professionals will and currently does exceed supply. This is due to the attrition of professionals who might be categorized within the baby-boomer cohort. It is hard to predict how the medical industry will impact health physics employment demand. We know that this will cause a growth in demand but it is hard to estimate the impact of new technology on the profession. I encourage you to review the reports on the human capital crisis available on the Health Physics Society website and an equivalent but independent report produced by the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI).

The salary earned is by and large comparable when folks are employed in the same facilities and have basically the same credentials. However, the professional engineers, PE credential, one expected of senior engineers, because of its status in law may command a slightly larger income in most cases. Further, because health physicists have a tendency to be associated with more diverse employment opportunities, they have a slightly larger diversity in their salary distribution.

I hope this response helps you to understand the two disciplines better.

Rich Brey, PhD, CHP
Answer posted on 19 April 2006. The information and material posted on this website is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Website. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
image
image
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings